Divergence through differential frequency: The grammaticalization of the Japanese connective soredewa ‘now/then’

Tanno, Koji

doi:10.1016/j.amper.2016.05.001

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This idea is consistent with the idea of entrenchment (Bybee et al, 2007), which holds that the strength of the cognitive representation of a word or a structure depends on its frequency. With respect to studies on connectives, previous research (e.g., Canestrelli et al, 2013;Tanno, 2016) has similarly argued that the increase of cooccurrence of a specific meaning and a connective can lead to a shift in meaning for that connective.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interpretation of Discourse Connectives Is Probabilistic: Evidence From the Study of But and Although

Asr

Demberg

2020

Discourse Processes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Connectives can facilitate the processing of discourse relations by helping comprehenders to infer the intended coherence relation holding between two text spans. Previous experimental studies have focused on pairs of connectives that are very different from one another to be able to compare and formalize the distinguishing effects of these particles in discourse comprehension. In this article, we compare two connectives, but and although, which overlap in terms of the relations they can signal. We demonstrate in a set of carefully controlled studies that while a connective can be a marker of several discourse relations, it can have a specific fine-grained biasing effect on linguistic inferences and that this bias can be derived (or predicted) from the connectives' distribution of relations found in production data. The effects that we find speak to the ambiguity of discourse connectives, in general, and the different functions of but and although, in particular. These effects cannot be explained within the earlier accounts of discourse connectives, which propose that each connective has a core meaning or processing instruction. Instead, we here lay out a probabilistic account of connective meaning and interpretation, which is based on the distribution of connectives in production and is supported by our experimental findings.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interpretation of Discourse Connectives Is Probabilistic: Evidence From the Study of But and Although

Asr

Demberg

2020

Discourse Processes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Semantic change through the discursive strategy of justification: The grammaticalization of the Japanese connective datte

Tanno

2017

Language Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Divergence through differential frequency: The grammaticalization of the Japanese connective soredewa ‘now/then’

Cited by 2 publications

References 32 publications

Interpretation of Discourse Connectives Is Probabilistic: Evidence From the Study of But and Although

Interpretation of Discourse Connectives Is Probabilistic: Evidence From the Study of But and Although

Semantic change through the discursive strategy of justification: The grammaticalization of the Japanese connective datte

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About