Divergent patterns in institutional entrepreneurship of MNCs in emerging economies

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop a theoretical framework that addresses the question of how and why multinational corporations (MNCs) from developed economies engage in divergent patterns of institutional entrepreneurship (IE) in emerging markets. Design/methodology/approach The authors combine IB’s concept of institutional voids with comparative capitalism’s insights into the institutional embeddedness of firm capabilities and IE. This theoretical cross-fertilisation is instrumental in developing a refined understanding of institutional voids and how MNCs proactively engage with them. Findings The authors emphasise the notion of institutional voids as a relative concept and, thereby, move away from an ethnocentric view of emerging markets as “empty spaces” that are void of institutions. The authors’ framework proposes that MNCs from liberal and coordinated market economies experience institutional voids differently and engage in different patterns of IE. Research limitations/implications The main limitation of this work is that the propositions are restricted to the country-of-origin effect and that the observations are based on anecdotal evidence only. Against these limitations the authors call for a more comprehensive research agenda in their conclusion. Social implications The paper sensitises policymakers in emerging markets for the potentially different patterns of involvement of MNCs in their institutional environments. Specifically, the authors argue that MNCs may have a strong inclination to rebuild critical elements of their home country’s institutional setting in emerging markets. This touches upon questions of national sovereignty and highlights the need for emerging market policymakers to decide which kinds of institutional settings they would like or not like to see imported. Originality/value The paper provides a new and critical perspective of the mainstream IB concept of institutional voids. The authors’ key contribution is to highlight that the home country institutional context may substantially matter in how MNCs perceive and respond to institutional voids in emerging markets.

Assortment Portfolio Price Positioning of a Transnational Corporation in the Ukrainian Market

“…At the third stage of the positioning concept evolution, key aspects are built in the framework of the brand management concept [1,4]. Unlike John Francis Trout, representatives of this stage focus on emotional benefits as one of the most powerful bases for product differentiation, and within this direction, the key components of brand positioning, such as identity elements, value proposition, brand-communications, and advantages highlighted and developed.…”

“…In foreign and domestic scientific literature, some problems of price positioning of transnational corporations considered many authors [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. In these works, the definitions of the key concepts of strategic management that form the basis of the positioning concept are given: 1) positioning related to the long-term strategy of the company since it takes time to create the desired position; 2) positioning occurring in the minds of consumers; 3) positioning based on obtaining the benefit; 4) the product's position in the mind of one buyer may differ from the same product's position in the mind of another buyer.…”

Understanding When MNCs can Overcome Institutional Distance: A Research Agenda

“…However, overcoming distance as involving deviating behavior, that is, 5 adopting practices "that fall outside the zone of conformity" (Aguilera et al 2016, p. 17) in a particular host environment, can be very important because it enables firms to replicate their competitive advantages or operate effectively across borders (Kogut and Zander 1992), which frequently involves the transfer of knowledge and practices from home to host country. Drawing on insights from CC literature (Hall and Soskice 2001;Whitley 1999), which explores how institutions shape firm behavior and organizational strategies and practices but recently has developed greater appreciation for agentic and deviant behavior (Aguilera et al 2016;Becker-Ritterspach et al 2017;Morgan 2011), this paper aims to contribute to a mapping of the conditions that enable MNCs to overcome distance by addressing the following theoretical puzzle: When are MNCs enabled to engage in deviant behavior in institutionally distant settings?…”

Inequality through MNE–emerging economy coevolution? A political actor view on Myanmar/Burma’s peacebuilding

“…Beyond political and developmental studies (e.g., Richmond, 2004;Cederman et al, 2011), the role of corporations, in specific multinational enterprises (MNEs), has been emphasized within emerging economy research (see Meyer and Peng, 2016 for a recent overview), too, to exceed pure economic functions and, for better or worse, include that of a political actor (Forsgren, 2013). This study draws on the emerging economy literature as a part of the scholarly field of international business (IB) which has elaborated on the passive adaptational (Meyer and Peng, 2016) and proactive influencing (Becker-Ritterspach et al, 2017) roles of MNEs in the social and economic development of emerging economies.…”