2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.rhisph.2021.100312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Divergent root P uptake strategies of three temperate grassland forage species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar effect was observed also for the grass species Dactylis glomerata , which in our study was found to be significantly associated with the MYC+CO meadow ( French, 2017 ). Although we did not perform a chemical characterization of the forage, previous studies found increased P levels in forage from AM inoculated plants ( Smith et al., 2003 ; Chippano et al., 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar effect was observed also for the grass species Dactylis glomerata , which in our study was found to be significantly associated with the MYC+CO meadow ( French, 2017 ). Although we did not perform a chemical characterization of the forage, previous studies found increased P levels in forage from AM inoculated plants ( Smith et al., 2003 ; Chippano et al., 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the smaller diameter of hyphae and lower metabolic cost of hyphal growth, AMF may be more exible in response to nutrient patches than roots (Hodge, 2006). Mycorrhizal fungi have been reported to have a strong in uence on root proliferation and root function (Cui and Caldwell, 1996;Cheng et al, 2016;Gao et al, 2021), and therefore, change root foraging and plant nutrient uptake strategies (Felderer et al, 2013;Chippano et al, 2021). However, AMF colonization is not always bene cial for plants, as mycorrhizal associations vary from mutualism to parasitism, depending on the host species, soil fertility, and other environmental conditions (Klironomos, 2003;Shah et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the smaller diameter of hyphae and lower metabolic cost of hyphal growth, AMF may be more exible in response to nutrient patches than roots (Hodge, 2006). Mycorrhizal fungi have been reported to have a strong in uence on root proliferation (Cui and Caldwell, 1996;Cheng et al, 2016), and therefore, change root foraging and plant nutrient uptake strategies (Tibbett, 2000;Felderer et al, 2013;Chippano et al, 2021). However, AMF colonization is not always bene cial for plants, as mycorrhizal associations vary from mutualism to parasitism, depending on the host species, soil fertility, and other environmental conditions (Klironomos, 2003;Shah et al, 2009;Facelli et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%