Since the appearance of the studio figure at the beginning of the 20th century in Vienna and the consolidation of the Bauhaus proposals as the ideal teaching model, a variety of strategies to approach the architectural project have appeared trying to respond to contextual, political, and cultural problems. However, many strategies remain attached to logics that demand an update that includes transdisciplinary proposals focused on students.This research, concerned with the pedagogy of the project, suggests that to propose more efficient and up-to-date project didactics, these must be approached not only from the logics of project research but also must intersect with the studies of creativity, and iii dpARQ-UPV the voice of the students, their concerns and their ways of learning, since it is considered that teaching is a complex gear that is built in the relationships between actors and their contextual variables.Consequently, and to address the aforementioned fronts, the research was structured on three pillars whose hypotheses emerged as both the State of the Art and the Study Case were developed. First, an exploration of creativity studies was made to define where the architectural production is framed concluding that it lyes on an interdependent system, and that problem construction is needed to guarantee original and quality proposals. Second, in the light of project research, some models and process typologies were analyzed, concluding that the models linked to the Scientific Paradigm are contraindicated for project disciplines and, that the studio teaching needs a fundamental change.Third and to support these findings, a Stuy Case was developed at the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (Bogota) with the participation of about 2000 students of the Architecture Program. They were interviewed, surveyed, tested, and observed for a year. All sources were analyzed according to the Grounded Theory guidelines and after three cycles of analysis and conceptualization, it is concluded that there are five factors that suggest relevant changes in the pedagogy of the project and that, consistent with the initial proposal. These factors synthesize all the findings resulting from the analysis and their interpretation and suggest changes that will promote deeper and motivated learning from: textit the dimensions of teaching planning, the school climate, the Conjecture-Analysis models, the construction of problems, and the differentiation of teaching strategies.