Diverse and competing interests around tobacco: qualitative analysis of two decades of parliamentary questions in India

Abstract

IntroductionIndia continues to enhance tobacco control regulations protecting the public health while housing a widespread tobacco industry. This implies complexities in regulating tobacco. As part of a broader inquiry on the political economy of tobacco, we aimed to understand the concerns of Indian parliamentarians around tobacco.MethodsWe sourced transcripts of tobacco-related questions asked by parliamentarians between the years 1999 and 2019 from the electronic archives of both the houses of Indian parliament. We analysed the frequency of questions during different regimens, segregated by the states and the political parties that parliamentarians belonged to, as well as by the government ministries to which these questions were posed. We also conducted thematic content analysis of these questions, identifying specific themes defining parliamentarians’ concerns.Results729 unique parliamentarians asked 1315 questions about tobacco, conveying varied concerns related to health, commerce, labour and agriculture sectors. Over time, the focus of the questions shifted from majorly trade to majorly health-related concerns. We show how the tobacco regulations in India are multi-institutional and are a result of negotiations of several legitimate and competing, interests. We found important state-level differences in the number and nature of these questions.ConclusionParliamentary questions constitute a useful resource in studying tobacco politics. Tobacco regulations are a product of complex negotiation of varied and competing concerns. We identify core arguments in favour and against tobacco control that would help tobacco control advocates and agencies to better prepare and engage with diverse political voices around tobacco.

Analyzing arguments on tobacco tax increases. Focus on French parliamentary questions and responses, 2000–2020

“…Third, since this study focuses on the specific French context, the generalizability of our findings to other countries is limited, especially for those without a monopoly on tobacco sales, or less exposed to cross-border trade. Fourth, if analyzing parliamentary debates is relevant to highlight lobbying arguments [31][32][33][34][35] , they must be completed by other analyses, including other parliamentary documents (amendments, minutes of committee debates or plenary sessions), arguments disseminated through the trade press, general press, and interviews of MPs, to better understand how they set up their decision in favor or against tobacco taxation.…”

Climate change: the missing discourse in the Indian Parliament

“…PQs can be used as a metric for the government to gauge public mood and adapt policies and actions accordingly (Sen et al 2019). As such, PQs have been used to explore the relationship between media coverage and the Parliament (Datta 2008, van Santen et al 2015, parliamentarian concerns related to gender (Bird 2005), tobacco (Varma et al 2021), crime and unemployment (Borghetto et al 2020), and issues related to science and technology (Haritash and Gupta 2002).…”