2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00343-021-1173-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diverse transformations of sulfur in seabird-affected sediments revealed by microbial and stable isotope analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, these values likely do not represent true marine conditions but rather are chemically linked to a different aspect of general sulfuric cycling or possibly diagenesis. Other possible sources of sulfur fractionation leading to changes in 34 S enrichment include the presence of sulfate‐reducing bacteria, volcanic activity, and chemosynthetic oxidation, among others (Shen et al., 2022; Thode, 1991). Aside from this anomalous interval, the sulfur isotope values thereafter begin to agree with interpretations based on carbon, nitrogen, and palynological analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, these values likely do not represent true marine conditions but rather are chemically linked to a different aspect of general sulfuric cycling or possibly diagenesis. Other possible sources of sulfur fractionation leading to changes in 34 S enrichment include the presence of sulfate‐reducing bacteria, volcanic activity, and chemosynthetic oxidation, among others (Shen et al., 2022; Thode, 1991). Aside from this anomalous interval, the sulfur isotope values thereafter begin to agree with interpretations based on carbon, nitrogen, and palynological analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, the forest floor quality and biogeochemistry deposition are among common consequences of the ornithogenic ecosystem alterations (Hobara et al, 2001;Ellis, 2005). Thus, the birds feaces, which are extremely rich in phosphorus (Osono, 2012;Zhu et al, 2014;Wurster et al, 2015;Domínguez et al, 2017;Telesford-Checkley et al, 2017;Otero et al, 2018), nitrogen (Legrand et al, 1998;Tomassen et al, 2005;Barrett et al, 2006;Aislabie et al, 2008) and ammonia (Mizutani and Wada, 1988;Zhu et al, 2011;Riddick et al, 2014;Crittenden et al, 2015;Croft et al, 2016), as well as organic matter (Huang et al, 2014;Chen et al, 2020), affect the soil and sediment microbiomes (Zhu et al, 2015;Shen et al, 2023). Moreover, they introduce significant concentrations of Mg, Ca, K and Zn (Ellis et al, 2006;Breuning-Madsen et al, 2010;García et al, 2011) into the affected soil, having significant impact on both microbial communities (Wang et al, 2015;Santamans et al, 2017;Minkina et al, 2022) and fungal diversity (Adamonytė et al, 2013;Kutorga et al, 2013) of the latter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%