“…More recently, several studies have used the length of terminal branches in time-calibrated phylogenies as a proxy for the age of extant species, an approximation that we hereafter refer to as "phylogenetic age" (Alzate et al, 2023;Davies et al, 2011;Gaston & Blackburn, 1997;Johnson et al, 2002;Pie & Caron, 2023;Sonne et al, 2022;Tanentzap et al, 2020;Verde Arregoitia et al, 2013). These phylogenetic ages have been used as the basis to test for links between species age and current extinction risks (Tanentzap et al, 2020;Verde Arregoitia et al, 2013) and to assess various correlations with evolutionary, biogeographical, and ecological patterns in living species (Alzate et al, 2023;Freer et al, 2022;Kennedy et al, 2022;Pie & Caron, 2023) While several studies have used phylogenetic age at face value for species age (e.g., Johnson et al 2002;Tanentzap et al 2020;Verde Arregoitia et al 2013), their potential deviation from the true species ages remains unclear. Specifically, we identify three nonmutually exclusive shortfalls that can lead to over-or underestimation of species ages.…”