2018
DOI: 10.3390/su10113920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversified Forage Cropping Systems and Their Implications on Resilience and Productivity

Abstract: Plant diversity is associated with resilient ecosystems. Loss of plant biodiversity triggered by anthropogenic and climatic factors jeopardizes environmental stability and sustainable forage production. The understanding of biodiversity mechanisms and functional traits of species can help to design forage production systems to buffer against perturbations. Resilience and productivity are linked to plant species characteristics and interactions that enable them to recover from adverse conditions and compensate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative ecological effects of high input agricultural systems have amplified interest in organic cropping systems. Organic cropping systems promote crop production and soil fertility through ecosystem processes such as nutrient cycling, crop–weed competition, pollination, and by biologically based pest regulation (Altieri 1999, Tilman et al 2002, Isbell et al 2017, Islam and Ashilenje 2018). Maintaining agroecosystem biodiversity is vital to sustaining these processes (Altieri 1999, Jordan and Vatovec 2004, Robertson et al 2014, Dainese et al 2019) and is shaped by agronomic management (Booth and Swanton 2002, Smith and Mortensen 2017); therefore, it is imperative to understand the unique effects of specific organic management practices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative ecological effects of high input agricultural systems have amplified interest in organic cropping systems. Organic cropping systems promote crop production and soil fertility through ecosystem processes such as nutrient cycling, crop–weed competition, pollination, and by biologically based pest regulation (Altieri 1999, Tilman et al 2002, Isbell et al 2017, Islam and Ashilenje 2018). Maintaining agroecosystem biodiversity is vital to sustaining these processes (Altieri 1999, Jordan and Vatovec 2004, Robertson et al 2014, Dainese et al 2019) and is shaped by agronomic management (Booth and Swanton 2002, Smith and Mortensen 2017); therefore, it is imperative to understand the unique effects of specific organic management practices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The removal of perennial crops in the crop rotations by anthropogenic and climatic factors in the Corn Belt region in the USA has resulted in reduced biodiversity, increased soil and nutrients losses, and reduced water quality [1][2][3]. Less diverse cropping systems are more vulnerable to abiotic and biotic stresses [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less diverse cropping systems are more vulnerable to abiotic and biotic stresses [4][5][6]. A more diverse, resilient and stable cropping system has the ability to persist over time with minimal variability in productivity over the years, even if subjected to disturbance or adverse conditions such as drought [3]. Under future climate scenarios, it is estimated that more diversified rotations, including alfalfa, can mitigate crop water stress and increase in soil organic carbon [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Complementary plant architecture can bring advantages in the caption of solar energy for photosynthesis [ 21 ]. The plant growth habit, leaf arrangement, leaf angle, or branching strongly influence the interception of light and the radiation partitioning, which can lead to a complementary use of light by plant mixtures [ 22 ]. In fact, as already pointed out with the R/S differences, legume and grass species prioritized shoot or root development in opposite ways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%