2000
DOI: 10.1080/09585180010004937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversion at the point of arrest: mentally disordered people and contact with the police

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The referral and screening process seem appropriate in that 91% of women assessed were deemed to have a mental illness; this compares favourably with the 85% and 90% identified by other police station-based schemes in England and Wales (James, 1999;Riordan et al, 2000). Previous research has shown high levels of mental disorder in female sentenced prisoners (O'Brien et al, 2003;Prison Reform Trust, 2004) especially among single women (Badger et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The referral and screening process seem appropriate in that 91% of women assessed were deemed to have a mental illness; this compares favourably with the 85% and 90% identified by other police station-based schemes in England and Wales (James, 1999;Riordan et al, 2000). Previous research has shown high levels of mental disorder in female sentenced prisoners (O'Brien et al, 2003;Prison Reform Trust, 2004) especially among single women (Badger et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Of those referred, 31% were admitted to hospital and 44% of those not admitted were referred on to community services. A similarly successful scheme in Birmingham was described by Riordan (2000), with community psychiatric nurses providing a 24-hour service, 7 days a week. Successful recognition of those with mental disorder has led to early diversion and provision of care.…”
Section: Police Station Diversion Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of diversion services in diverting offenders from the criminal justice system has been described (Exworthy & Parrot, 1994;Joseph & Potter, 1993), in particular, those schemes offering assessment and diversion at the point of arrest (James, 2000;Riordan, Wix, Kenney-Herbert, & Humphreys, 2000). Diversion schemes also provide rapid assessment and transfer from prison to psychiatric care when a need is identified (Weaver et al, 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%