“…Significantly, such studies also lead us to question preconceived notions of whom might be considered "non-local" on the basis of either geographical provenance or biogeographical ancestry in the past, and to examine our own biases. The recent isotopic, genetic and forensic evidence for ethnic diversity in both Roman and Tudor Britain (Leach et al, 2009(Leach et al, , 2015Martiniano et al, 2016;Scorrer et al, 2021), and the negative reception of these findings by some (largely anti-immigration) factions of the British media and public, highlights the value of such studies in illuminating past societies, and also the part such research can play in helping to dispel dangerous myths of racial or cultural homogeneity in past populations. The field must, however, also acknowledge, anticipate, and challenge narratives that attempt to draw on isotopic studies that may show a lack of past population mobility, for example, to support nationalist agendas, as recently called for with ancient DNA studies (e.g., Hakenbeck, 2019).…”