2004
DOI: 10.1080/03946975.2004.10531202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversity and composition of dung beetle (Scarabaeinae) assemblages in a heterogeneous Andean landscape

Abstract: In a montane region of Colombia, the diversity and composition of the dung beetle (Scarabaeinae) assemblages were sampled and analyzed in natural and anthropogenic habitats: primary forest, secondary forest, pasture and cropland. The total number of species per habitat was similar (between 10 species in cropland and 13 in secondary forest). Inventory completeness was over 90%, except for cropland where over 82% of the true species richness was recorded. Greater numbers of species and individuals were found in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
40
0
12

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
40
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Davis and Sutton 1998;Davis 2000;Holloway et al 1992;Shahabuddin et al 2005) and South or Central America (Howden and Nealis 1975;Klein 1989;Flavila and Halffter 1997;Spector and Ayzama 2003;Medina et al 2002;Escobar 2004;Avendaño-Mendoza et al 2005;Durães et al 2005). The relatively few studies of effects of habitat disturbance on dung beetles from East Africa have had their focus on the rain forest habitat (Nummelin and Hanski 1989;Zilihona and Nummelin 2001;Newmark and Sentoza 2003;Chapman et al 2003), whereas research relating dung beetle fauna to forest/bush degradation in more arid, Afrotropical areas, has been restricted to South Africa (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Davis and Sutton 1998;Davis 2000;Holloway et al 1992;Shahabuddin et al 2005) and South or Central America (Howden and Nealis 1975;Klein 1989;Flavila and Halffter 1997;Spector and Ayzama 2003;Medina et al 2002;Escobar 2004;Avendaño-Mendoza et al 2005;Durães et al 2005). The relatively few studies of effects of habitat disturbance on dung beetles from East Africa have had their focus on the rain forest habitat (Nummelin and Hanski 1989;Zilihona and Nummelin 2001;Newmark and Sentoza 2003;Chapman et al 2003), whereas research relating dung beetle fauna to forest/bush degradation in more arid, Afrotropical areas, has been restricted to South Africa (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…How do their patterns of movement in the landscape differ; and, are any differences in movement pattern associated with interspecific differences in wing loading? In the Colombian Andes, O. conspicillatum is a dominant species where there is cover of anthropic origin such as sun-grown coffee crops and appears to avoid entering large patches of forest (Escobar 2004;Cultid et al 2012). In contrast, D. cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus, beetles have an important role in the removal of dung and recycling of nutrients, improving the condition of the soil and contributing to the biological control of flies and parasites that are disease vectors (Nichols et al 2008). Given that dung beetle assemblages in sun-grown coffee plantations in the Andes are dominated by large species that account for much of the beetle community's biomass in these systems (Escobar 2004;Cultid et al 2012), and considering the ephemeral nature of the resource these beetles use to feed and nest (excrement, carrion), they are expected to have a relatively high degree of mobility and therefore large foraging areas (Cambefort and Hanski 1991). That being said, the population ecology of these species and our knowledge of their functional impact on agricultural landscapes is in its infancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are also composed of species with a strong dependence on well-conserved forest areas, and little capacity for expansion into degraded open areas that have been cleared of arboreal vegetation (Escobar 2004). The cultivation of B. patinoi under a diversified and permanent cover of trees (As1) maintains a diversity and structure of dung beetle assemblage similar to that observed in Fp and Fs, while for B. patinoi that is grown below scattered trees (As2) or has a high sowing density (As3) dung beetle diversity is similar to that of abandoned agricultural fields.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%