Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion within Pediatric Adherence Science

Abstract

Given the long-standing history of systemic racism in psychological science, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts are increasingly vital to the advancement and improvement of the field. This commentary extends the seminal work of the article Upending Racism in Psychological Science: Strategies to Change How Our Science is Conducted, Reported, Reviewed, and Disseminated (Buchanan et al., Am Psychol, 10.31234/osf.io/6nk4x, 2020) by providing tangible applications and recommendations to improve DEI integration into pediatric adherence science. Real-world adherence examples are discussed regarding the challenges faced in systematically integrating DEI principles, potential solutions to overcoming barriers, and the implications of these efforts on scientific advancement in an effort to address and dismantle research practices that perpetuate inequity and White supremacy. Specifically, we provide discourse and practical guidance related to the conduct, reporting, reviewing, and disseminatio n of pediatric adherence science to promote dialog and produce actionable change toward the promotion of health equity and social justice.

Recommendations on inclusive language and transparent reporting relating to diversity dimensions for the Journal of Pediatric Psychology and Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology.

“…The aims were to generate consistent reporting guidelines for diversity dimensions across the journals and to inform best practices for future research in pediatric psychology. The working group found many detailed, existing checklists and guidelines on inclusive language and transparent reporting relating to DEI (American Psychological Association, 2023b; Buchanan et al, 2021; Letzen et al, 2022; Matsui et al, 2020; Miller et al, 2019; Williford, Sweenie, et al, 2023). However, no comprehensive guidelines were available that captured the specific context of pediatric psychology (e.g., developmental/family considerations), while also being broadly applicable across the field (e.g., not focused on a specific condition or symptom).…”

Determinants of adherence to insulin and blood glucose monitoring among adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes in Qatar: a qualitative study

“…The terms “adherence,” “nonadherence,” “adherents and non-adherents”, “poor metabolic control” and “glycemic control” are not recommended. Additionally, consider the use of “suboptimal” rather than “poorer.” Please see the following links for inclusive language guidelines and recommendations: https://www.dstigmatize.org/resources/language-tools/ https://www.diabeteseducator.org/practice/practice-tools/app-resources/diabetes-language-paper Williford et al (2023 1 ). Introduction: Consider the use of “subsequent”, it may be a more appropriate word than “hence” in the last paragraph of the Introduction.…”