Diversity in HIV epidemic transitions in India: An application of HIV epidemiological metrices and benchmarks

Abstract

Background The Joint United Nations Programme on AIDS (UNAIDS) has emphasized on the incidence-prevalence ratio (IPR) and incidence-mortality ratio (IMR) to measure the progress in HIV epidemic control. In this paper, we describe the status of epidemic control in India and in various states in terms of UNAIDS’s recommended metrices. Method The National AIDS Control Programme (NACP) of India spearheads work on mathematical modelling to estimate HIV burden based on periodically conducted sentinel surveillance for providing guidance to program implementation and policymaking. Using the results of the latest round of HIV Estimations in 2019, IPR and IMR were calculated. Results National level IPR was 0.029 [0.022–0.037] in 2019 and ranged from 0.01 to 0.15 in various States and Union Territories (UTs). Corresponding Incidence-Mortality Ratio was at 0.881 [0.754–1.014] nationally and ranged between 0.20 and 12.90 across the States/UTs. Conclusions Based on UNAIDS recommended indicators for HIV epidemic control, namely IPR and IMR; national AIDS response in India appears on track. However, the program success is not uniform and significant heterogeneity as well as expanding epidemic was observed at the level of States or UTs. Reinforcing States/UTs specific and focused HIV prevention, testing and treatment initiatives may help in the attainment of 2030 Sustainable Development Goals of ending AIDS as a public health threat by 2030.

Elimination of Vertical Transmission of HIV and Syphilis as a Public Health Threat in India

“…While the program has been phenomenally successful in preventing new HIV infections and AIDS-related mortality through four phases of NACP and the overall response is on track, there are specific implementation domains that require focus and prioritization to accelerate the progress towards the attainment of the 2030 goal. [ 3 - 6 ] Elimination of vertical transmission of HIV and syphilis (EVTHS) is one such area.…”

Stated preferences for new HIV prevention technologies among men who have sex with men in India: A discrete choice experiment

“…Epidemiological analyses at regional, state, and local levels have revealed extensive differences in HIV incidence and prevalence, and distinct epidemic trajectories within India [ 3 , 4 ]. Tamil Nadu in southern India and Maharashtra in western India are among 10 states with the highest HIV prevalence [ 4 ].…”

“…Epidemiological analyses at regional, state, and local levels have revealed extensive differences in HIV incidence and prevalence, and distinct epidemic trajectories within India [ 3 , 4 ]. Tamil Nadu in southern India and Maharashtra in western India are among 10 states with the highest HIV prevalence [ 4 ]. Importantly, immense population disparities persist in HIV incidence and prevalence; the epidemic is concentrated among men who have sex with men (MSM), as well as transgender women, female sex workers, and people who inject drugs, with HIV prevalence estimated from 7 to 28 times higher than the general adult population [ 2 – 4 ].…”

Uptake and impact of COVID-19 vaccination among HIV key populations: a cohort study from Tamil Nadu, India

“…MSM who were HIV-positive from China were found to have a very low uptake of 8.7%, mainly due to concerns about side effects and fear of HIV-positive status disclosure 12 ) . India, the country with the second largest HIV epidemic, has an estimated 2.35 million people living with HIV (PLHIV) 13 ) . Although studies on vaccine uptake rates in the general population have been conducted in India, no studies have been conducted on HIV KPs.…”