2015
DOI: 10.1071/mf14033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversity in immature-shark communities along a tropical coastline

Abstract: Effective conservation and management of shark populations is complicated by our limited understanding of their spatial ecology. For example, there are scarce data on diversity in community structure and nursery function across broader geographic scales (e.g. across multiple inshore systems) and the implications of this diversity for shark populations. Accordingly, fishery-independent surveys were undertaken to investigate shark communities along ,400 km of the tropical eastern coast of Australia (18.1-20.68S,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, variable depth utilisation by immature sandbar sharks Carcharhinus plumbeus within (Rechisky and Wetherbee 2003) and between McCandless et al 2007) adjacent bays in the north-west Atlantic may have been influenced by spatial heterogeneity in hydrodynamics, prey distributions and predation risk (McCandless et al 2007). These results suggest that, in response to biotic and abiotic conditions, young sharks may adopt different tactics in different bays or avoid certain bays altogether (Yates et al 2015b). The temporal distribution of neonates corroborates the general predominance of summer parturition in the study species across tropical Australia (Last and Stevens 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, variable depth utilisation by immature sandbar sharks Carcharhinus plumbeus within (Rechisky and Wetherbee 2003) and between McCandless et al 2007) adjacent bays in the north-west Atlantic may have been influenced by spatial heterogeneity in hydrodynamics, prey distributions and predation risk (McCandless et al 2007). These results suggest that, in response to biotic and abiotic conditions, young sharks may adopt different tactics in different bays or avoid certain bays altogether (Yates et al 2015b). The temporal distribution of neonates corroborates the general predominance of summer parturition in the study species across tropical Australia (Last and Stevens 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In particular, over larger geographic scales, some bays may provide nursery habitat for these species while others may not (Yates et al 2015b). Heupel et al (2007) provided three criteria for the identification of a shark nursery: (1) relatively high abundance of neonates or young juveniles, (2) site fidelity and (3) Rockingham and Repulse bays, these locations may meet the first nursery area criterion and therefore be particularly important for these species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, the mediumbodied spottail shark Carcharhinus sorrah exhibits high site fidelity to single nearshore embayments with individuals using small home ranges and consistent habitats [22], similar to large-bodied juvenile populations. However, at a population level, C. sorrah use a wide range of coastal habitats and juvenile and adult spottails are known to occupy the same coastal areas simultaneously [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%