2001
DOI: 10.1021/ic001345l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversity in the Structural Chemistry of (Phosphine)gold(I) 1,3,4-Thiadiazole-2,5-dithiolates (Bismuthiolates I)

Abstract: A series of dinuclear (phosphine)gold(I) complexes of the ambidentate 1,3,4-thiadiazoledithiolate ligand (SSS) were prepared in high yield from the corresponding (phosphine)gold(I) chlorides and K(2)(SSS) in methanol. While mononuclear components (R(3)P)AuCl with R(3) = Ph(3), Ph(2)Py, or Me(3) (1-3) gave open-chain complexes, the dinuclear components ClAu(Ph(2)P-E-PPh(2))AuCl with E = (CH(2))(6), (C(5)H(4))Fe(C(5)H(4)), or 1,4-CH(2)C(6)H(4)CH(2) afforded cyclic complexes (4-6). The products have been characte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, evidence for aurophilic interactions are reported in the bridged Au I :L 1 systems, where the relative strength of the aurophilic interactions can be affected by solvent contributions and other complexing ligands 35, 36. Schmidbaur and co‐workers37 have also suggested that increased flexibility of phosphine ligands can promote aurophilic interactions, indicating that the relative contributions of aurophilic interactions in the Class I and Class II ligands are likely different. The observed difference in reduction efficiencies of the predominant complexes between classes could also be affected by aurophilic contributions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, evidence for aurophilic interactions are reported in the bridged Au I :L 1 systems, where the relative strength of the aurophilic interactions can be affected by solvent contributions and other complexing ligands 35, 36. Schmidbaur and co‐workers37 have also suggested that increased flexibility of phosphine ligands can promote aurophilic interactions, indicating that the relative contributions of aurophilic interactions in the Class I and Class II ligands are likely different. The observed difference in reduction efficiencies of the predominant complexes between classes could also be affected by aurophilic contributions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexes whose structures are reported include one ruthenium, 22 one mercury, 20 one thallium 21 and gold complexes. 23, 24 The thallium complex is not a discrete complex but a solid state polymer constructed mainly of ionic interactions between {Tl(Me) 2 } ϩ and DMcT 2Ϫ (Tl ؒ ؒ ؒ S > 3.2 Å, Tl ؒ ؒ ؒ N > 2.7 Å), and DMcT 2Ϫ may be regarded as a counter anion rather than a ligand. The mercury, gold and ruthenium complexes are molecular complexes, in which the DMcT 2Ϫ ligand coordinates to the metal center via the thiolate sulfur atoms.…”
Section: Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, these ligands have a potential coordinating ability to other transition metal(s) through the pyridine-N atom in order to construct new supra molecules such as ''molecular-dots'' and/or ''molecular-wires'' (Scheme 1) by virtue of the strong interaction [12,13]. Second, the S atom sometimes works as a multidendate coordinating site to yield sophisticated supra structures in addition to induce and/or strengthening aurophilicity [14][15][16]. Another interesting examples were reported previously by Che and Puddephat for (LAu) 3 (S 3 C 3 N 3 ), which loses two ligand groups L in solution and dimerized to give a hexamer, Au 6 L 4 (S 3 C 3 N 3 ) [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%