2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2021.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversity in transition: Is transitions research diverse (enough)?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This underpins the need for thorough analyses of innovations' outcomes. In this regard, further elaboration should take into consideration approaches other than the ample research-and underlying understandings of sustainability innovations-from the Global North, which we have largely used in our research (Nesari et al 2022;Preuß et al 2021;Ramos-Mejía et al 2018).…”
Section: A Generic Systems-based Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This underpins the need for thorough analyses of innovations' outcomes. In this regard, further elaboration should take into consideration approaches other than the ample research-and underlying understandings of sustainability innovations-from the Global North, which we have largely used in our research (Nesari et al 2022;Preuß et al 2021;Ramos-Mejía et al 2018).…”
Section: A Generic Systems-based Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topic of just transitions in general and inclusive transitions in particular is gaining momentum in the transitions research agenda [1][2][3]. Yet, practical projects on energy transitions often still neglect societal problems such as energy poverty and unequal pay structures between women and men, including in the energy sector [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the socio-technical literature on transitions taking place in areas in the Global South has suggested that rather than just transferring frameworks developed in the Global North, such as the sociotechnical perspective, to the Global South, such frameworks should be refined to better account for contextual differences, including the roles of informal economies, splintered regimes, and multi-scalar insecurities, that strongly inform individuals' daily practices and general transition pathways (U. E. Hansen et al 2018;Ramos-Mejía, Franco-Garcia, and Jauregui-Becker 2018;Wieczorek 2018;Ghosh et al 2021). The findings of the thesis support this and point to several ways in which the refinement of socio-technical sustainability transitions theories for application in non-Global North contexts could serve to make analyses more sensitive to nuanced differences in transitions in these contexts, and hence increase the theory's explanatory capacities (U. E. Hansen et al 2018;Ghosh et al 2021;Preuß et al 2021). Two sets of changes are identified in the literature and corroborated by the findings of this thesis:…”
Section: A More Nuanced Understanding Of the Factors Shaping Socio-te...mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Second, changes in agri-food systems are inherently cultural processes, yet an engagement with culture is generally absent in the field of sustainability transitions (Meek 2016). Incorporating understandings of the interplays between culture, different worldviews, and sustainability is crucial to ensuring that sustainability transitions processes will be viable in the future and across broad segments of the global population (Ghosh et al 2021;Preuß et al 2021). Cultural aspects could be better included in socio-technical frameworks through e.g.…”
Section: Implications For Policy and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%