Diversity Manipulation of Psychrophilic Bacterial Consortia for Improved Biological Treatment of Medium-Strength Wastewater at Low Temperature

Augelletti, Floriana; Jousset, Alexandre; Agathos, Spiros N.; Stenuit, Benoît

doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.01490

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 45 publications

(64 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…New, designed ecologies have a rich foundation in cybernetic theory (McNaughton and Coughenour 1981), landscape architecture (Palmer et al 2004, reviewed by Ross et al 2015) and the practice of ecological engineering (Mitsch and Jørgensen 2003). The resulting new combinations of species and technologies span at least ten scientific fields (Table 1) and many scales, including: microbial ecology which has forged advanced methods of wastewater treatment (Augelletti et al 2020); agroecology that has integrated the culturing of different species in multitrophic aquaculture (Li et al 2019); and aerospace engineering which is developing ecological life support systems for long‐haul space exploration (Wheeler 2017). These new ecological systems are a frontier among ecosystems and a step towards ‘a future in which many ecosystems…are designed' (Higgs 2016).…”

Section: New and Designed Ecologies Of The Anthropocenementioning

confidence: 99%

Synthetic ecosystems: an emerging opportunity for science and society?

Hammond

Kolasa

Fung

2023

Oikos

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For millenia, humans have modified aspects of natural ecosystems to meet their social, economic and ecological needs. With advancing technology and global movement of species, modification has shifted to designing and creating new ecologies in cityscapes, building interiors, agricultural settings and more. We call intentional ecosystems that combine biodiversity and technology with little to no shared history, synthetic ecosystems. Fields, from microbial ecology to agroecology, build synthetic ecosystems under different names but share the same properties of: Being human‐designed, assembled and controlled, having novel components and/or interactions, and creating systems distinctly different from what came before at a site. Creating synthetic ecosystems represents a design challenge, but also an opportunity for real‐world impact – which we illustrate with a biodiverse, indoor synthetic ecosystem for food production. Overall, synthetic ecosystems may advance socioecological goals in six ways. They can: 1) replace ecological deadzones with living systems (e.g. building green roofs), 2) enhance existing ecosystem processes (e.g. boosting agricultural yields), 3) create new ecosystem functions (e.g. bioelectricity), 4) establish new ecosystem controls (e.g. biological control), 5) foster knowledge synthesis (e.g. testing ecological theory) and 6) reshape human‐nature relationships (e.g. improve wellbeing). To realize these potentials, future work must more fully evaluate whereandwhen synthetic ecosystems are appropriate to build, whatarchitectures and aspects of diversity (biological and technological) make them most functional and how knowledge from across cultures and eras can be integrated in solutions.

show abstract