2009
DOI: 10.1029/2008jb005959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversity of channeling flow in heterogeneous aperture distribution inferred from integrated experimental‐numerical analysis on flow through shear fracture in granite

Abstract: Shear (Mode II) fractures with shear displacements of 1 and 5 mm were generated by direct shear on granite under normal stresses of 1, 20, and 60 MPa. Fracture surface mapping showed that the surface roughnesses of the shear fractures decreased with increasing shear displacement and normal stress and were smaller than those of tensile fractures reported in our previous study. Fluid flow experiments on the shear fractures provided fracture permeabilities at a wide range of confining pressures of 10–100 MPa. Non… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
115
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
3
115
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Except the study by Watanabe et al (2008), who highlight qualitative insights into the flow structures, all other studies in Table 1 quantify and intend to validate simulated fracture flow. In a subsequent study which is not listed in Table 1, Watanabe et al (2009) applied a similar (non-quantitative) procedure for other fracture types. By contrast, quantification of fracture flow was performed by Indraratna et al (2015), who performed CFD simulations based on initial laser-scanning measurements, where the flow model is coupled with a deformation criteria simulating fracture closing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Except the study by Watanabe et al (2008), who highlight qualitative insights into the flow structures, all other studies in Table 1 quantify and intend to validate simulated fracture flow. In a subsequent study which is not listed in Table 1, Watanabe et al (2009) applied a similar (non-quantitative) procedure for other fracture types. By contrast, quantification of fracture flow was performed by Indraratna et al (2015), who performed CFD simulations based on initial laser-scanning measurements, where the flow model is coupled with a deformation criteria simulating fracture closing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, quantification of fracture flow was performed by Indraratna et al (2015), who performed CFD simulations based on initial laser-scanning measurements, where the flow model is coupled with a deformation criteria simulating fracture closing. Similar, but more simplified, deformation procedures were performed for statistically derived aperture distributions (Pyrak-Nolte and Morris, 2000), profilometer measurements (Kim et al, 2003), laser-scan data (Nemoto et al, 2009;Watanabe et al, 2008Watanabe et al, , 2009) and a conceptual 2-D model (Liu et al, 2010). Furthermore, Dicman et al (2004) described changes in aperture distribution by combining laboratory data and stochastic approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geological realism of multi-Gaussian structures has been questioned [Gomez-Hernandez and Wen, 1998], and alternatives that emphasize connectivity and channeling, have been considered for fractures [Tsang and Doughty, 2003;Tsang et al, 2008]. Many studies have indeed emphasized the significance of channeling in fractures [e.g., Tsang and Tsang, 1989;Tsang and Neretnieks, 1998;Watanabe et al, 2009], which in general will be a consequence of both large variability in T [Tsang and Tsang, 1989] and its correlation structure [Cvetkovic and Shapiro, 1989;Tsang and Doughty, 2003]. To capture this combined effect, a generic model for non-multi-Gaussian structures will be used.…”
Section: Transmissivity Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has been performed regarding the actual flow speed of groundwater inside such fractures, and regarding the hydraulic characteristics of rock by focusing on the network of fractures. As the hydraulic characteristics of rock are the accumulation of the hydraulic characteristics of each fracture, it is necessary to develop a hydraulic model of a single fracture to predict a large-scale hydraulic behavior (e.g., Raven and Gale 1985;Yeo et al 1998;Chen et al 2000;Olsson and Barton 2001;Kim and Inoue 2003;Watanabe et al 2008;Chen et al 2009;Watanabe et al 2009). When a shear displacement takes place in a rock fracture having rough surfaces, it may cause significant changes in the pore structure (e.g., Mitsui et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%