2013
DOI: 10.2503/jjshs1.82.106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversity of Chloroplast DNA in Various Mandarins (Citrus spp.) and Other Citrus Demonstrated by CAPS Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…sinensis ) and pummelo ( C . maxima ) into the same category [33,47,50,53,54,57], but this study separated them into different categories. Curk and colleagues classified citrus varieties into six categories with three chloroplast DNA markers and three mitochondrial DNA markers [47].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sinensis ) and pummelo ( C . maxima ) into the same category [33,47,50,53,54,57], but this study separated them into different categories. Curk and colleagues classified citrus varieties into six categories with three chloroplast DNA markers and three mitochondrial DNA markers [47].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ninomiya et al (2015) and Nonaka et al (2017) reported the cultivar identification and parental analysis of new citrus cultivars in Japan using these markers. In addition, for chloroplast (cp) DNA analysis, CAPS uses universal primers and has proven to be a simple and reliable method for many genera (Cipriani and Morgante, 1993;Taberlet et al, 1991), including citrus (Asadi Abkenar et al, 2004;Fujii et al, 2016;Nicolosi et al, 2000;Yamamoto et al, 2013Yamamoto et al, , 2017. These results indicate the usefulness of CAPS analysis in terms of both the nuclear genome and cpDNA for phylogenetic studies of citrus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…(Palmer et al, 1988;Bayer et al, 2009;Lu et al, 2011). More recently, different molecular markers such as cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) of cpDNA (Yamamoto et al, 2013;Ninomiya et al, 2015;Fujii et al, 2016) (Nonaka et al, 2017;Dorji and Yapwattanaphun, 2015;Froelicher et al, 2011), have been used for identification, parentage analysis and phylogeny of citrus species or cultivars.…”
Section: Introduction Smentioning
confidence: 99%