2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversity of Conotoxin Gene Superfamilies in the Venomous Snail, Conus victoriae

Abstract: Animal venoms represent a vast library of bioactive peptides and proteins with proven potential, not only as research tools but also as drug leads and therapeutics. This is illustrated clearly by marine cone snails (genus Conus), whose venoms consist of mixtures of hundreds of peptides (conotoxins) with a diverse array of molecular targets, including voltage- and ligand-gated ion channels, G-protein coupled receptors and neurotransmitter transporters. Several conotoxins have found applications as research tool… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
161
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
11
161
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, using traditional protein-centric drug discovery approaches has been a tedious and time-consuming task that allows only superficial mining of the huge chemical diversity of natural products and that usually leads to the identification of only a few bioactive peptides per experiment (77). During the past decade, several studies focusing solely on cone snail venom duct (43,44,49,(78)(79)(80) or salivary gland (9,43,44,49,(78)(79)(80) transcriptomes, and later complemented by proteome profiling (46,47,50,59,81), have allowed the report of no more than only a hundred (47 on average) full-length precursor conotoxins each. The great majority of these studies used the ROCHE 454 next-generation sequencing platform because it produced low amounts of long reads that were possible to annotate by performing simple homology BLAST searches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, using traditional protein-centric drug discovery approaches has been a tedious and time-consuming task that allows only superficial mining of the huge chemical diversity of natural products and that usually leads to the identification of only a few bioactive peptides per experiment (77). During the past decade, several studies focusing solely on cone snail venom duct (43,44,49,(78)(79)(80) or salivary gland (9,43,44,49,(78)(79)(80) transcriptomes, and later complemented by proteome profiling (46,47,50,59,81), have allowed the report of no more than only a hundred (47 on average) full-length precursor conotoxins each. The great majority of these studies used the ROCHE 454 next-generation sequencing platform because it produced low amounts of long reads that were possible to annotate by performing simple homology BLAST searches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) contain non-disulfide rich toxins. The signal region of these non-disulfide rich sequences were found to be similar to the signal sequences of the non-disulfide rich toxins described in Conus victoriae (Robinson et al, 2014), Conus litteratus , and Conus consors (Violette et al, 2012) (Fig. 7).…”
Section: Toxinssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…A total of 41, 22, and 74 highly putative conotoxin-like sequences were identified from these turrid snails, respectively. Similar studies using high-throughput sequencing to search for peptide toxins have been done for cone snails such as Conus bullatus (Hu et al, 2011), Conus victoriae (Robinson et al, 2014), and Conus pulicarius (Lluisma et al, 2012), but none so far with turrid snails. The toxin sequences discovered here provide further proof that conotoxins and turrid toxins share superfamilies and cysteine frameworks not only limited to the I 2 , O, and P superfamilies but also to the B 2 , D, L, M, O 1 , and S superfamilies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…However, the challenge of extracting conotoxin sequences from raw-sequence data has been addressed by bioinformatics programs and pipelines. One approach has been to assemble raw reads and use similarity search-ing using BLAST and profile Hidden Markov Models (pHMMs) against sequence databases [114,119]. However standalone programs such as ConoDictor [120] and ConoSorter [121] have now been released to take large-scale raw sequence data and rapidly classify them into conotoxin superfamilies and help accelerate the process of discovering novel conotoxins as well as novel conotoxin superfamilies.…”
Section: Sequence-based Discovery Of Conotoxinsmentioning
confidence: 99%