“…Twenty (16.5%) publications reported using spoligotyping as one of the methods for detecting MSIs, with a majority employing one (Pavlic et al, 1999;Cox et al, 2005;García De Viedma et al, 2005;Umubyeyi et al, 2007;Furphy et al, 2012;Biffa et al, 2014;Chaoui et al, 2014;Lamine-Khemiri et al, 2014;Ssengooba et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2015;Egbe et al, 2017;Baffoe-Bonnie et al, 2019) or two (García De Viedma et al, 2003;Mokrousov et al, 2009;Huyen et al, 2012;Navarro et al, 2015;Silva-Pereira et al, 2019) additional methods ( Supplementary Table 2). Only three reports used spoligotyping as the sole genotyping method and reported MSIs at frequencies ranging from 11.8 to 57.1% (Andrews et al, 2008;Kamakoli et al, 2018;Guernier-Cambert et al, 2019). One significant limitation of spoligotyping is that it can underestimate MSIs as hybridization signals from multiple strains in a sample can overlap and appear as a single pattern (Kamakoli et al, 2018).…”