2023
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1164937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversity of the protease-producing bacteria and their extracellular protease in the coastal mudflat of Jiaozhou Bay, China: in response to clam naturally growing and aquaculture

Abstract: The booming mudflat aquaculture poses an accumulation of organic matter and a certain environmental threat. Protease-producing bacteria are key players in regulating the nitrogen content in ecosystems. However, knowledge of the diversity of protease-producing bacteria in coastal mudflats is limited. This study investigated the bacterial diversity in the coastal mudflat, especially protease-producing bacteria and their extracellular proteases, by using culture-independent methods and culture-dependent methods. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lysobacter, Thiobacillus, Antarcticibacterium, Sphingomonas, Salinimicrobium, Pontibacter, Gemmatimonas, Ellin6067, RB41, Gillisia, Zeaxanthinibacter, MND1, Erythrobacter, and Intrasporangium were dominant in sea rice soils, with the sum of 34.01%. The potential proteolytic activity of the top 50 abundant genera of the bacterial community was shown (Table S2), among which Lysobacter, Pontibacter, Arthrobacter, Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Streptomyces, and Planococcus has been previously reported with the proteinase-producing strains [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], Arthrobacter, Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Streptomyces, Planococcus, and Nocardioides were isolated as proteinaseproducing bacteria by the subsequent culture-dependent methods in this study. The genera in red font were isolated as proteinase-producing bacteria by the subsequent culture-dependent methods or have been previously reported with the proteinase-producing strains.…”
Section: Alpha Diversity and Taxonomy Composition Analysis Of Bacteri...mentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lysobacter, Thiobacillus, Antarcticibacterium, Sphingomonas, Salinimicrobium, Pontibacter, Gemmatimonas, Ellin6067, RB41, Gillisia, Zeaxanthinibacter, MND1, Erythrobacter, and Intrasporangium were dominant in sea rice soils, with the sum of 34.01%. The potential proteolytic activity of the top 50 abundant genera of the bacterial community was shown (Table S2), among which Lysobacter, Pontibacter, Arthrobacter, Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Streptomyces, and Planococcus has been previously reported with the proteinase-producing strains [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], Arthrobacter, Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Streptomyces, Planococcus, and Nocardioides were isolated as proteinaseproducing bacteria by the subsequent culture-dependent methods in this study. The genera in red font were isolated as proteinase-producing bacteria by the subsequent culture-dependent methods or have been previously reported with the proteinase-producing strains.…”
Section: Alpha Diversity and Taxonomy Composition Analysis Of Bacteri...mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The proteinase-producing activity of the isolated culturable bacteria was detected using previously estabilished methods [25]. The protein substrate plates consisted of 0.2% yeast extract, and 1.5% agar in artificial seawater, with different protein substrates including milk powder (1.0%), casein, or gelatin (0.5%), respectively.…”
Section: Proteinase Production Ability Detection Of the Isolated Strainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation