2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-019-03240-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diverted versus undiverted restorative proctocolectomy for chronic ulcerative colitis: an analysis of long-term outcomes after pouch leak short title: outcomes after pouch leak

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ten out of 43 (27%) diverted patients with a pouch leak, and 53 of 92 (60%) of undiverted patients with a pouch leak underwent an unplanned ostomy within 200 weeks of surgery (p < 0.01). The rate of pouch salvage operations over total follow-up was similar between the two groups, 74% and 78% of patients with a pouch leak [37]. In another retrospective evaluation of 4031 IPAA patients, of whom 357 developed pelvic sepsis with a diverting ileostomy and 31 without, there was a higher rate of reoperation for diverting ileostomy (48%) in patients without diverting ileostomy at time of IPAA compared with patients with diverting ileostomy (12%); p < 0.0001.…”
Section: Controversies One- Two- or Three-stage Ipaamentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Ten out of 43 (27%) diverted patients with a pouch leak, and 53 of 92 (60%) of undiverted patients with a pouch leak underwent an unplanned ostomy within 200 weeks of surgery (p < 0.01). The rate of pouch salvage operations over total follow-up was similar between the two groups, 74% and 78% of patients with a pouch leak [37]. In another retrospective evaluation of 4031 IPAA patients, of whom 357 developed pelvic sepsis with a diverting ileostomy and 31 without, there was a higher rate of reoperation for diverting ileostomy (48%) in patients without diverting ileostomy at time of IPAA compared with patients with diverting ileostomy (12%); p < 0.0001.…”
Section: Controversies One- Two- or Three-stage Ipaamentioning
confidence: 69%
“…However, randomizing by surgery type is a difficult approach, and only one study has randomized by diversion 68. Lastly, surgeons may have a clinical preference towards undiverted surgery in patients who are ‘healthier’ (ie, lack of anastomosis tension, good pelvic dissection, nutritional status and decreased immunosuppressant doses)5 because an undiverted pouch can have more favorable preoperative and operative characteristics and because diversion does not always prevent pouch excision 5 25 69 70. This potential preference might explain why there were so few studies comparing the outcomes directly between IPAA diverted versus undiverted ileostomy procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Since 1978, the gold standard surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) is restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (RP-IPAA), which can be performed via laparoscopic or open procedure, in one, two or three stages and constructed with an S-reservoir, a J-reservoir or a W-reservoir. 4 Data from Widmar et al 5 suggest that diversion does not prevent pouch excision and a need for long-term diversion after pouch leak in adult patients. Recently, Khalid et al 6 demonstrated greater probability of anastomotic strictures (odd ratio (OR) 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26 to 0.62, p<0.0001) and pouch failures (OR 0.54 (0.36 to 0.82), p=0.003) in adult diverted than in non-diverted patients, although reoperation was more frequently required in non-diverted patients (OR 2.51 (1.12 to 5.59), p=0.02).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In those patients who leaked, there was a higher rate of pouch excision in the diverted group, but a higher rate of reintervention within 30 days in the undiverted group. 4 Similarly, a study by Lavryk et al examining 4,031 IPAA patients found no difference in pouch survival between diverted (n ¼ 326) and undiverted patients (n ¼ 31) who experienced pelvic sepsis (88% vs. 87% at 10 years). However, the undiverted group was associated with a higher reoperation rate (48% vs. 12%, p < 0.0001).…”
Section: Undiverted Ipaamentioning
confidence: 92%