2021
DOI: 10.4000/eces.6299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diverting Welfare Paths: Ethnicisation of Unemployment and Public Work in Hungary*

Abstract: A new vision of "illiberal democracy" was introduced by the Orbán-led Fidesz government in the 2010s, which marked the end of the welfare state, and the central element of the political discourse once again became the creation of a labour-based society. The new workfarist trend in employment indicated a new direction in active labour market policy, favouring public work schemes. However, public work regulations put a disproportionate burden on the Roma unemployed, while disregarding the contributing factors le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What in practice functions since 2010 as a workfare regime is informed by narratives of poverty as self-inflicted and thus primarily targets those 'worthy' of support. Roma populations are clearly most at risk as the workfare regime subjects them to tight bureaucratic control in which local governments not only distinguish between deserving and undeserving poor but also maintain spatial and social boundaries between Roma communities and other local inhabitants (Hungler and Kende, 2021;Virág, 2020). At the same time, the ideological centrality of traditional families is manifested in social policies that target 'middle-class families with an average or above-average income' (Pivarnyikv, 2018) and the demonization of samesex marriages, for example, through legislation that effectively bans them from adopting children.…”
Section: Boundary-making As Culture War: Socio-cultural Norming and P...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What in practice functions since 2010 as a workfare regime is informed by narratives of poverty as self-inflicted and thus primarily targets those 'worthy' of support. Roma populations are clearly most at risk as the workfare regime subjects them to tight bureaucratic control in which local governments not only distinguish between deserving and undeserving poor but also maintain spatial and social boundaries between Roma communities and other local inhabitants (Hungler and Kende, 2021;Virág, 2020). At the same time, the ideological centrality of traditional families is manifested in social policies that target 'middle-class families with an average or above-average income' (Pivarnyikv, 2018) and the demonization of samesex marriages, for example, through legislation that effectively bans them from adopting children.…”
Section: Boundary-making As Culture War: Socio-cultural Norming and P...mentioning
confidence: 99%