Divided We Stand? The AD HOC Tribunals and the CEE Region

Bílková, Veronika

doi:10.1017/s2398772300009090

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…41 It all depends on which branch of international law and the rules that have been breached. Under human right regime, the appropriate forum can either national courts or specialised courts 42 provided the court is seized of jurisdiction and the conditions of admissibility are met.…”

Section: Reparation For Internally Displaced Persons (Idps) and The Cmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards the Evolution of Right to Reparation for Loss of Housing and Property of Internally Displaced Persons (IDPS) in Nigeria

Ekpa¹,

Dahlan²

2015

MJSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

During internal conflicts, displaced victims are confronted with wide range of physical and psychological trauma to their persons coupled with loss of their homes and other life time investments. Relocating these victims to safe place (IDPs camps) alone will be far from given them much touted hope for returning to normal lives. At the international level, there is a growing recognition of the significance of extending reparation (which comprises of restitution, relocation, reintegration and compensation) to internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) as means of assuaging the impact of wrongful acts committed against them in accordance with the time honoured legal aphorism -ubi jus ibi remedium which means where there is a wrong there must be a remedy. In Nigeria, owing to multiple factors compensating victims for loss of homes and other tangible properties in particular is yet to arouse the needed attention that it deserves as government primary attention has continually been overwhelmed by the need to provide immediate succour. This article as a conceptual discourse attempt to x-ray the various context that reparation can be gauged for internally displaced persons arising from recurring internal crisis in

show abstract

Section: Reparation For Internally Displaced Persons (Idps) and The Cmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards the Evolution of Right to Reparation for Loss of Housing and Property of Internally Displaced Persons (IDPS) in Nigeria

Ekpa¹,

Dahlan²

2015

MJSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…17 Zooming in on specific political contexts, Veronika Bílková and Bing Bing Jia present refined analyses of the type of support that Central European states and China, respectively, have given to the ad hoc tribunals and how these states' perceptions of the tribunals' legacies have influenced their approaches to the ICC. 18 We conclude with two pieces that address the legacies of the tribunals and the AJIL Symposium more generally, with diverging conclusions. David Luban identifies "bequests" of the ad hoc tribunals in at least five areas: making history; resisting denialism; demystifying sacred violence; reconciliation and peacemaking; and latitude for militaries.…”

mentioning

confidence: 94%

Leaving Legacies Open-Ended: An Invitation for an Inclusive Debate on International Criminal Justice

Benveniśtî

Nouwen

2016

AJIL Unbound

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As a response to the Symposium on the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda published by the American Journal of International Law on the occasion of the tribunals’ closure, this AJIL Unbound Symposium intends to broaden the debate on the “legacies” of those courts. The AJIL Symposium contains articles on the creation of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR); the ad hoc tribunals’ jurisprudential contributions; and their extra-legal impacts and legacies. The concept of “legacy” is itself contested and the appropriateness of the courts’ own efforts to consolidate it may be questioned, especially as they have barely ended (or are about to end) their work. Nevertheless, their over two decades of existence does provide an occasion to assess all they have done and not done, and have affected, intentionally and unintentionally. Against that background, we have invited a group of scholars to respond to the AJIL Symposium and to reflect upon the work of the tribunals with a view to enriching the debate with more voices, from different regions, from different interest groups, and from different disciplines.

show abstract

Divided We Stand? The AD HOC Tribunals and the CEE Region

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Towards the Evolution of Right to Reparation for Loss of Housing and Property of Internally Displaced Persons (IDPS) in Nigeria

Towards the Evolution of Right to Reparation for Loss of Housing and Property of Internally Displaced Persons (IDPS) in Nigeria

Leaving Legacies Open-Ended: An Invitation for an Inclusive Debate on International Criminal Justice

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About