2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2012.00190.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Divine Direction: How Providential Religious Beliefs Shape Foreign Policy Attitudes

Abstract: Despite recent scholarly and popular work regarding the role of religion in US foreign policy, we still know little about how religious factors affect the public's foreign policy views. This paper proposes one potential mechanism for influence—the connection of providential beliefs to foreign policy issues through a compelling religious frame—and tests the explanatory power of this approach through a nationally administered survey experiment. The “providential” orientation of respondents—the extent to which th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One insight from the focus groups and survey experiment is that scientific teachings and this‐worldly action can be framed as contributing to, rather than subtracting from, religious teachings and modes of action. In contexts where science and religion are seen to jointly explain social problems, our priming experiment confirms the power of providential cues (Glazier 2013, 2015)—in this case to encourage religious conservatives’ support for this‐worldly solutions to environmental problems. This finding merits further investigation within other evangelical communities outside of the Global North.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…One insight from the focus groups and survey experiment is that scientific teachings and this‐worldly action can be framed as contributing to, rather than subtracting from, religious teachings and modes of action. In contexts where science and religion are seen to jointly explain social problems, our priming experiment confirms the power of providential cues (Glazier 2013, 2015)—in this case to encourage religious conservatives’ support for this‐worldly solutions to environmental problems. This finding merits further investigation within other evangelical communities outside of the Global North.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Additionally, recent scholarship demonstrates that individual's religious beliefs can influence their political behavior: from foreign policy attitudes (Djupe and Calfano 2013;Glazier 2013) to charitable giving (Lunn, Klay, and Douglass 2001) to opinions on the role of government (Baylor 2011). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Religion influences political activity in a variety of ways — from the impact of religious tradition on vote choice (Layman 2001; Guth et al 2006) to the correlation between church attendance and civic skills (Verba and Nie 1972; Jones-Correa and Leal 2001; Lasswell 1936, Verba, Schlozman, and Brady 1995). Additionally, recent scholarship demonstrates that individual's religious beliefs can influence their political behavior: from foreign policy attitudes (Djupe and Calfano 2013; Glazier 2013) to charitable giving (Lunn, Klay, and Douglass 2001) to opinions on the role of government (Baylor 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LRCS provides a few important variables that are not available in the CCS. First, the LRCS survey included two questions to measure providential religious beliefs—or the belief that God has a plan that people can help bring about (Glazier 2013; 2017). Providential religious believers are more likely to engage in political activity, under certain circumstances (Glazier 2015) and providential clergy may be more likely to undertake some political actions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%