2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2016.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Divine restraint: An experimental analysis of religious preference and intertemporal discounting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior research is split on the impact of religiosity as a protective factor for addiction, with some studies suggesting that it does not impact things such as delay discounting (Thornton, McCarty, & Stokes, 2017) while others suggest it may be an important factor which could be utilized for treatment (Seghatoleslam et al, 2015). The results of the present review are also conflicted and nuanced making it difficult to draw specific clinical recommendations at this time.…”
Section: Section 42: Implications and Further Directionsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Prior research is split on the impact of religiosity as a protective factor for addiction, with some studies suggesting that it does not impact things such as delay discounting (Thornton, McCarty, & Stokes, 2017) while others suggest it may be an important factor which could be utilized for treatment (Seghatoleslam et al, 2015). The results of the present review are also conflicted and nuanced making it difficult to draw specific clinical recommendations at this time.…”
Section: Section 42: Implications and Further Directionsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Prior research is split on the impact of religiosity as a protective factor for addiction, with some studies suggesting that it does not impact things such as delay discounting ( Thornton, McCarty, & Stokes, 2017 ) while others suggest it may be an important factor which could be utilized for treatment ( Seghatoleslam et al, 2015 ). The results of the present review are also conflicted and nuanced making it difficult to draw specific clinical recommendations at this time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%