Oceans 2008 2008
DOI: 10.1109/oceans.2008.5152080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diving behavior of female loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) during their internesting interval and an evaluation of the risk of boat strikes

Abstract: New advantages in science and technology, such as time depth recorders (TDRs), have allowed researchers to study the dive behavior of sea turtles in their natural habitats. Observing dive behavior of internesting turtles has provided significant evidence on how to protect nesting turtles from human interactions. One source of anthropogenic mortality on marine turtles is boat strikes. Trend data from the Florida Sea Turtle Stranding Network demonstrate that the annual proportions of boat-strike related mortalit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the behavioral patterns estimated in this study, most CM were distributed in shallow waters where there is potentially higher exposure to marine traffic, but those CM distributed in deeper waters (up to 12 m) are less exposed to marine traffic and have more room to avoid occasional vessels. LK and CC are likely to be more vulnerable to threats related to the presence of vessels (e.g., disturbance, behavioral changes, vessel strikes) (Sobin, 2008), as they move substantially across the region and spend slightly longer periods at the surface (>20 s) in consistently shallow waters. Future studies on the cumulative and synergistic effect of this and other potential threats (e.g., hook-and-line, pot fisheries, trawl fisheries, water quality, algal blooms) on the overall health of nearshore habitats and consequently their impact on marine turtle foraging ecology could enhance effective management of threats to the local marine turtle populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the behavioral patterns estimated in this study, most CM were distributed in shallow waters where there is potentially higher exposure to marine traffic, but those CM distributed in deeper waters (up to 12 m) are less exposed to marine traffic and have more room to avoid occasional vessels. LK and CC are likely to be more vulnerable to threats related to the presence of vessels (e.g., disturbance, behavioral changes, vessel strikes) (Sobin, 2008), as they move substantially across the region and spend slightly longer periods at the surface (>20 s) in consistently shallow waters. Future studies on the cumulative and synergistic effect of this and other potential threats (e.g., hook-and-line, pot fisheries, trawl fisheries, water quality, algal blooms) on the overall health of nearshore habitats and consequently their impact on marine turtle foraging ecology could enhance effective management of threats to the local marine turtle populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manatees share the waterways with hundreds of thousands of watercraft: registered watercraft (https: // www.flhsmv.gov/motor-vehicles-tags-titles/ vessels/ vessel-owner-statistics), unregistered watercraft, and watercraft visiting Florida from other states or countries (Wright et al 1995). Watercraft harm manatees and a variety of marine wildlife including ceta ceans (Wells & Scott 1997, Stone & Yoshinaga 2000, Fonnesbeck et al 2008, Wells et al 2008, Conn & Silber 2013, Christiansen et al 2016 and sea turtles (Hazel & Gyuris 2006, Hazel et al 2007, Singel et al 2008, Sobin & Eckert 2008. It has long been known that collisions with watercraft are a significant threat to the Florida manatee (Wright et al 1995, USFWS 2001, Lightsey et al 2006, FWC 2007, Runge et al 2017, and regulations regarding the operation and speed of motorized watercraft in specified areas are important aspects of protection efforts (Calleson & Frohlich 2007, Calleson 2014, Rycyk et al 2018, Udell et al 2019.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To encourage expression of natural behavior, we tested 3 simple, low-cost EEDs for use with loggerhead turtles in rehabilitation centers: 1) a shelter to imitate corals and rocks that wild turtles have been observed resting under (Kirkden and Pajor 2006; Sobin and Tucker 2008), 2) brushes to allow scratching, 3) a pipe to allow assisted resting. The main objectives of this study were 1) to determine how much time loggerhead turtles interact with EEDs; and 2) to assess preferences in loggerhead resting behavior.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%