2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Division of diagenesis and pore evolution of a Permian Shanxi shale in the Ordos Basin, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the liquid hydrocarbon expulsion of OM and kerogen at a maturity of approximately 0.4–0.7% could also result in an increase in the PV owing to the appearance of organic bubble pores [ 22 ]. Additionally, the earlier dissolution and transformation of unstable minerals can contribute to the PV increases at different diameter scales [ 50 , 51 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the liquid hydrocarbon expulsion of OM and kerogen at a maturity of approximately 0.4–0.7% could also result in an increase in the PV owing to the appearance of organic bubble pores [ 22 ]. Additionally, the earlier dissolution and transformation of unstable minerals can contribute to the PV increases at different diameter scales [ 50 , 51 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) During the early diagenetic stage, corresponding to the immature stage of OM evolution ( R o < 0.8%, T max < 400°C), the OM was not in the “oil window” and only a small amount of biogenic methane was produced through biological action. At this time, the sediment was still muddy (not completely consolidated) 36 and the shale pore system was mainly composed of mesopores and macropores. With the development of diagenesis, compaction inhibited pore development, reducing PV and SSA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characteristics of pore type, pore structure, PSD, and clay mineral content have obvious changes during diagenesis. For example, macropores in montmorillonite decrease rapidly with increasing pressure, while micropores in OM gradually increase during the generation of hydrocarbon 36 . In the past few years, pore evolution has been studied mainly by comparing shale samples with different maturities from different regions, and discussing their porosities, pore structure characteristics, 6,8,17,37‐39 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the average porosity of high-mature shale with a burial depth of more than 2500 m is 3.02% in Sichuan Basin (Zou et al 2010) and 2.8% in Southern North China Basin (Yang and Guo 2020). However, the shale porosity in the thermal simulation experiment is always not less than 4% (Chen and Xiao 2014;Xie et al 2014;Guo and Mao 2019). Therefore, thermal simulation experiments alone cannot truly reflect the evolution of shale reservoirs.…”
Section: Edited By Jie Haomentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Regardless of the type of oil and gas research being conducted, the evolution process is an important and difficult topic. Thermal simulation experiments are often used to simulate thermal evolution in the laboratory to discuss hydrocarbon generation and diagenesis of shales (Xie et al 2014;Akande et al 2015;Guo and Mao 2019). The thermal maturation process undoubtedly has an important influence on the pore evolution of shale.…”
Section: Edited By Jie Haomentioning
confidence: 99%