2007
DOI: 10.22452/sejarah.vol15no15.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Division of Matrimonial Property in Malaysia: The Legal Historical Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common argument in jointly acquired property claims happened when the property obtained solely because of the efforts only from one party (Ibrahim & Hak, 2007). In this situation, the husbands are not aware of the indirect contribution that has been given by the wife and always deny wife's right in the matters of acquiring the property during the marriage period.…”
Section: Sole Venture and Implied Contribution Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most common argument in jointly acquired property claims happened when the property obtained solely because of the efforts only from one party (Ibrahim & Hak, 2007). In this situation, the husbands are not aware of the indirect contribution that has been given by the wife and always deny wife's right in the matters of acquiring the property during the marriage period.…”
Section: Sole Venture and Implied Contribution Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That type of claims should be allowed and considered as appropriate because denying the right of the spouse cause injustice, especially when it can be proven that the surviving party has contributed to acquire the property. It is exceptional if the surviving party volunteer on leaving the deceased's property and does not want to claim his or her right on the property (Ibrahim & Hak, 2007).…”
Section:  the Event Of Deathmentioning
confidence: 99%