2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10623-007-9052-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Division of trinomials by pentanomials and orthogonal arrays

Abstract: Consider a maximum-length binary shift-register sequence generated by a primitive polynomial f of degree m. Let C f n denote the set of all subintervals of this sequence with length n, where m < n ≤ 2m, together with the zero vector of length n. Munemasa (Finite fields Appl, 4(3): 252-260, 1998) considered the case in which the polynomial f generating the sequence is a trinomial satisfying certain conditions. He proved that, in this case, C f n corresponds to an orthogonal array of strength 2 that has a proper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dewar et al [7] suggests extending the results to finite fields other than F 2 . Once we are not in F 2 we can consider binomials (there are no irreducible binomials over F 2 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Dewar et al [7] suggests extending the results to finite fields other than F 2 . Once we are not in F 2 we can consider binomials (there are no irreducible binomials over F 2 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…2, we define notation and give previous results as well as we outline the general methodology. The most important result in this section is a simplification of Munemasa's conditions: we only require irreducible polynomials (or even reducible ones under the condition of no repeated roots) for the minimal polynomial of the LFSR instead of the primitive polynomial condition in previous results [7,21]. We also give some combinatorial applications for our results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations