2009
DOI: 10.1177/1069397109336648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Divorce Attitudes Around the World

Abstract: This article examines the link between culture and divorce attitudes using country-level data of the International Social Survey Programme 1994. Outside of examining the favorability of attitudes, we distinguish different types of attitudes based on whether the consequences of marital dissolution on children were considered when evaluating the acceptability of divorce. Testing competing hypotheses derived from attitude research and crosscultural psychology, we demonstrate that (a) individualist societies exhib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, divorce rate is more likely to be higher in individualistic societies. Indeed, the divorce rate was correlated with other indices of individualism (the index developed by Hofstede, 1980, 2001; Triandis's rating of individualism-collectivism) and variables related to individualism, such as the rate of pronoun drop (Kashima and Kashima, 1998) and pathogen prevalence (e.g., Fincher et al, 2008; Murray and Schaller, 2010) at the national level (e.g., Diener et al, 1995; Lester, 1995; Toth and Kemmelmeier, 2009; Hamamura, 2012). Thus, divorce rate has been frequently used as an indicator of individualism (e.g., Diener et al, 1995; Vandello and Cohen, 1999; Hamamura, 2012; Yamawaki, 2012; Grossmann and Varnum, 2015).…”
Section: Temporal Changes In Individualism In the Usmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, divorce rate is more likely to be higher in individualistic societies. Indeed, the divorce rate was correlated with other indices of individualism (the index developed by Hofstede, 1980, 2001; Triandis's rating of individualism-collectivism) and variables related to individualism, such as the rate of pronoun drop (Kashima and Kashima, 1998) and pathogen prevalence (e.g., Fincher et al, 2008; Murray and Schaller, 2010) at the national level (e.g., Diener et al, 1995; Lester, 1995; Toth and Kemmelmeier, 2009; Hamamura, 2012). Thus, divorce rate has been frequently used as an indicator of individualism (e.g., Diener et al, 1995; Vandello and Cohen, 1999; Hamamura, 2012; Yamawaki, 2012; Grossmann and Varnum, 2015).…”
Section: Temporal Changes In Individualism In the Usmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As confirmed by the results of SEM, and measured by structural coefficient, the effects of the attitude factor was greater than the total effects of the perceived behavioral control and subjective norms. Considering the effects of attitude on satisfaction (8,22), it seems logical that after a change in attitude toward the divorce and assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of doing this behavior, attitude has a great effect on the intention to divorce.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing studies on macro-level determinants of divorce attitudes examined a number of quite different types of country-level characteristics, including welfare state typologies (Gelissen 2003), economic factors (Toth and Kemmelmeier 2009), and cultural factors (Gelissen 2003;Toth and Kemmelmeier 2009). We selected a limited set of countrylevel factors that we expect to be particularly relevant in understanding country differences in the attitudes towards divorce involving young children.…”
Section: Country-level Determinantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on European attitudes and values is largely descriptive, as noted by Halman (1995) and Kalmijn and Uunk (2007). Of the relatively few studies that tried to explain crossnational value differences (Hofstede 1980;Gundelach 1994;Halman 1995;Inglehart 1997;Inglehart and Baker 2000;Toth and Kemmelmeier 2009), almost all are macrolevel studies that related aggregated data on attitudes to aggregate-level country characteristics. Gelissen (2003) constitutes an important exception, as he performed a thorough multilevel analysis of the cross-national determinants of attitudes towards divorce in Europe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation