2022
DOI: 10.1002/psp.2582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Divorce in transnational families: Norms, networks, and intersecting categories

Abstract: This paper highlights the originality and scholarly contributions of the present Special Issue on transnational divorces in three ways. First, it examines two sets of related literature and situates the Special Issue within them: one on divorces, in general, and the other on divorces in transnational families (also called here "transnational divorce"). This exercise identifies the scholarly tendencies and gaps needing immediate attention in the study of divorce at the present age of family (re) composition. Se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 86 publications
(116 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, there has been a call to return to intersectionality's original vision, for instance, by being conscious of its origins (Rice et al., 2019) or by showing ‘more sensitivity’ to its origin ‘within black feminism’ (Hopkins, 2019, p. 940). On the other hand, several feminist scholars welcome an open intersectionality allowing its continued evolution from being ‘domestic’ (Mahler et al., 2015) to ‘transborder’ (Fresnoza‐Flot & De Hart, 2022). As Davis (2020) argues, intersectionality, as a ‘travelling theory’ and as a ‘critical enquiry’, ‘demands an openness to a wide range of voices and perspectives’ (p. 124).…”
Section: Re‐clarifying Intersectionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, there has been a call to return to intersectionality's original vision, for instance, by being conscious of its origins (Rice et al., 2019) or by showing ‘more sensitivity’ to its origin ‘within black feminism’ (Hopkins, 2019, p. 940). On the other hand, several feminist scholars welcome an open intersectionality allowing its continued evolution from being ‘domestic’ (Mahler et al., 2015) to ‘transborder’ (Fresnoza‐Flot & De Hart, 2022). As Davis (2020) argues, intersectionality, as a ‘travelling theory’ and as a ‘critical enquiry’, ‘demands an openness to a wide range of voices and perspectives’ (p. 124).…”
Section: Re‐clarifying Intersectionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%