Divulgação científica para a imprensa: o modelo híbrido dos textos da Agência Bori com base em cinco perguntas essenciais

Righetti, Sabine; Flores, Natália Martins; Andrade, Fernanda Quaglio de; Morales, Ana Paula

doi:10.1590/1809-584420222120pt

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As this literature review largely focused on English-language literature, conducting a review of contributions published in other languages would be an important first step towards filling this gap. For example, Brazilian initiatives such as SciELO and the Bori Agency have launched PR efforts to increase the public visibility of OA publications ( Packer, 2014 ; Righetti et al ., 2022 ). In addition, discussions on how bridging OA and science communication could promote reflections on issues related to science, society, and democracy have gained strength in Brazil ( Barata, 2022 ).…”

Section: Recommendations For Future Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Making science public: a review of journalists’ use of Open Access research

Fleerackers,

Chtena,

Pinfield

et al. 2024

F1000Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Science journalists are uniquely positioned to increase the societal impact of open research outputs by contextualizing and communicating findings in ways that highlight their relevance and implications for non-specialist audiences. Yet, it is unclear to what degree journalists use open research outputs, such as open access publications or preprints, in their reporting; what factors motivate or constrain this use; and how the recent surge in openly available research seen during the COVID-19 pandemic has affected this. This article examines these questions through a review of relevant literature published from 2018 onwards—particularly literature relating to the COVID-19 pandemic—as well as seminal articles outside the search dates. We find that research that explicitly examines journalists’ engagement with open access publications or preprints is scarce, with existing literature mostly addressing the topic tangentially or as a secondary concern, rather than a primary focus. Still, the limited body of evidence points to several factors that may hamper journalists’ use of these outputs and thus warrant further exploration. These include an overreliance on traditional criteria for evaluating scientific quality; concerns about the trustworthiness of open research outputs; and challenges using and verifying the findings. We also find that, while the COVID-19 pandemic encouraged journalists to explore open research outputs such as preprints, the extent to which these explorations will become established journalistic practices remains unclear. Furthermore, we note that current research is overwhelmingly authored and focused on the Global North, and the United States specifically. We conclude with recommendations for future research that attend to issues of equity and diversity, and more explicitly examine the intersections of open access and science journalism.

show abstract

Section: Recommendations For Future Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Making science public: a review of journalists’ use of Open Access research

Fleerackers,

Chtena,

Pinfield

et al. 2024

F1000Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nota. Serie de preguntas a seguir para realizar periodismo y divulgación científica (Righetti et al, 2022(Righetti et al, ), elaboración propia. (2023.…”

Section: Ejemplo De Periodismo Y Divulgación Científicaunclassified

Periodismo y Divulgación Científica: Una Mirada con Perspectiva Teórica

Caraguay,

Quito-Ulloa,

Barnuevo

et al. 2024

RTED

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

La contemporaneidad digital de los medios de comunicación como radio, prensa escrita y televisión, han hecho una transición hacia plataformas digitales como respuesta al creciente uso de Internet y tecnología digital. Esta migración tuvo el objetivo de captar la atención de los millennials y sociedad en general, quienes cada vez más consumen información a través de la web y redes sociales, llegar eficazmente al público en el ámbito de la ciencia y tecnología se torna crucial en este contexto. La investigación abarcó tanto a periodistas científicos como a académicos utilizando un enfoque cualitativo con un diseño de estudio de caso. Metodológicamente, se integró revisión bibliográfica, técnicas de análisis de contenidos científicos y entrevistas semiestructuradas como instrumentos esenciales. En este escenario de cambio y crecimiento constante de Internet, con la web 3.0, se destaca la necesidad de actualizar herramientas digitales educativas para formar profesionales especializados en comunicación científica. Idóneos en entornos digitales dinámicos, estas adaptaciones son esenciales para preparar a los futuros profesionales para que se enfrenten a los desafíos emergentes del panorama comunicativo contemporáneo de la ciencia y divulgación científica.

show abstract

“…This is aimed at improving the quality and international positioning of the journals (Ferreira et al, 2019). In terms of disseminating research to society at large, SciELO should improve current practices of research press releases and its partnership with the Bori Agency dedicated to public science dissemination through a network of journalists (Righetti et al 2022).…”

Section: Language and Performance Of Journals In Communicating Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multilingualism in Scientific Literature Communicated by Journals from the SciELO Brazil Collection

Packer

2024

European Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article describes the internationalization of the Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), an open-science programme aimed at the development of capacities and infrastructure in research communication. It manages open-access collections of preprints, articles, research data, books, and book chapters, with a focus on national collections of non-profit peer-reviewed journals published by research communities of academic institutions, scientific societies, and associations. Celebrating 25 years of regular operation, SciELO improves research communication through professionalization, internationalization and sustainability of the indexed journals, maximizing their visibility and impact. In Brazil, the internationalization efforts by SciELO are aligned with national research policies, especially the internationalization of graduate programmes. The SciELO Brazil collection of journals evolves by adopting English solely or with Portuguese to improve the contribution of multilingualism to performing research by subject field. This article covers two decades of scientific literature in SciELO Brazil from 2003 to 2022. During this time, articles written in English or simultaneously in Portuguese and English increased significantly, resulting in a corresponding rise in access and citations received. The progress of the internationalization of the journals in the SciELO Brazil collection through multilingualism has been challenging both operationally and programmatically.

show abstract

Divulgação científica para a imprensa: o modelo híbrido dos textos da Agência Bori com base em cinco perguntas essenciais

Cited by 4 publications

References 4 publications

Making science public: a review of journalists’ use of Open Access research

Making science public: a review of journalists’ use of Open Access research

Periodismo y Divulgación Científica: Una Mirada con Perspectiva Teórica

Multilingualism in Scientific Literature Communicated by Journals from the SciELO Brazil Collection

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About