Myotonic dystrophy (DM1), the most common muscular dystrophy in adults, is caused by an expanded (CTG) n tract in the 3′ UTR of the gene encoding myotonic dystrophy protein kinase (DMPK) 1 , which results in nuclear entrapment of the 'toxic' mutant RNA and interacting RNAbinding proteins (such as MBNL1) in ribonuclear inclusions 2 . It is unclear if therapy aimed at eliminating the toxin would be beneficial. To address this, we generated transgenic mice expressing the DMPK 3′ UTR as part of an inducible RNA transcript encoding green fluorescent protein (GFP). We were surprised to find that mice overexpressing a normal DMPK 3′ UTR mRNA reproduced cardinal features of myotonic dystrophy, including myotonia, cardiac conduction abnormalities, histopathology and RNA splicing defects in the absence of detectable nuclear inclusions. However, we observed increased levels of CUG-binding protein (CUG-BP1) in skeletal muscle, as seen in individuals with DM1. Notably, these effects were reversible in both mature skeletal and cardiac muscles by silencing transgene expression. These results represent the first in vivo proof of principle for a therapeutic strategy for treatment of myotonic dystrophy by ablating or silencing expression of the toxic RNA molecules.Common features of adult-onset DM1 include myotonia, progressive skeletal muscle loss, cardiac conduction defects, smooth muscle dysfunction, cataracts and insulin resistance 2 . The normal number of CTG repeats (n = 5 to ~30) is higher (n = 50 to >3,000) in individuals with DM1 (ref. 1 ). Unlike the wild-type transcript, mutant DMPK mRNA forms nuclear aggregates 3,4 and is thought to trigger dominant effects by aberrant interactions with or altered activity of RNA splicing factors, principally members of the muscleblind-like (MBNL) family (such as MBNL1) and the CUG-BP and ETR3-like factor (CELF) family (such as CUG-BP1), leading to abnormal splicing of specific RNAs such as chloride channel (Clcn1), insulin Correspondence should be addressed to M.S.M. (mahadevan@virginia.edu). 4 These authors contributed equally to this work.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONSM.S.M., R.S.Y., Q.Y., C.D.F.-M., T.D.B. and L.H.P. performed experimental work and data analysis. S.B. generated the transgene constructs. M.S.M. was responsible for conceptual design and execution.
COMPETING INTERESTS STATEMENTThe authors declare that they have no competing financial interests. One potential therapeutic approach in DM1 is to get rid of the toxic RNA from cells. However, it is unclear if this will alleviate the effects of the disease. We used the tetracycline (Tet) inducible system with the reverse tetracycline transactivator (rtTA) to generate double transgenic mice harboring (i) a Tet-responsive, DMPK promoter 10,11 -driven transgene (named GFP-DMPK 3′ UTR) expressing the DMPK 3′ UTR mRNA as part of a GFP transcript, and (ii) a constitutively expressed rtTA transgene (Fig. 1a) Fig. 1). Notably, RNA blots of skeletal muscle RNA showed two major species due to alternative use of polyadenylation signal...