1985
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.8562135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA adduct formation and mutation induction by nitropyrenes in Salmonella and Chinese hamster ovary cells: relationships with nitroreduction and acetylation.

Abstract: Nitrated pyrenes are environmental pollutants and potent mutagens in the Salmonella reversion assay. In this study reversion induction by 1-nitropyrene and 1,8-dinitropyrene in Salmonella typhimurium TA1538 and mutation induction by 1-nitropyrene in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells were related to the extent of metabolism and DNA adduct formation. In suspension cultures of Salmonella typhimurium TA1538, 1,8-dinitropyrene was up to 40-fold more mutagenic than 1-nitropyrene, although both compounds were metabol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since most nitroso compounds are more mutagenic in TA98NR than TA98 and most nitro compounds are more mutagenic in TA98 than in TA98NR (Table I), it is tempting to speculate that the classical nitroreductase catalyzes sequential 1 ereductions while the alternate nitroreductase may catalyze concerted 2e-reductions. It is not clear from the data presented here and elsewhere [Heflich et al, 1985b;Fifer et al, 19861 which reduction is rate limiting. Since 2-NOF is much more mutagenic than 2-NF (Table I) it would seem that reduction of the nitroso group proceeds faster than the nitro group.…”
Section: Nitroso Derivativescontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…Since most nitroso compounds are more mutagenic in TA98NR than TA98 and most nitro compounds are more mutagenic in TA98 than in TA98NR (Table I), it is tempting to speculate that the classical nitroreductase catalyzes sequential 1 ereductions while the alternate nitroreductase may catalyze concerted 2e-reductions. It is not clear from the data presented here and elsewhere [Heflich et al, 1985b;Fifer et al, 19861 which reduction is rate limiting. Since 2-NOF is much more mutagenic than 2-NF (Table I) it would seem that reduction of the nitroso group proceeds faster than the nitro group.…”
Section: Nitroso Derivativescontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…In addition, based on studies with TA98NR, 1-NP and 1-and 3-nitro-BaP are all reduced to mutagens by the classical nitroreductase [Mermelstein et al, 1981;Pitts et al, 1984;Chou et al, 1985, 19861. The amounts of 1-NP metabolized to 1-AP by the cultures after 1 hr of incubation were similar to the amounts reported by Heflich et al [1985] using strain TA1538. Even a 1% increase in the conversion of nitro-BaPs to nitroso-BaPs could account for the synergistic mutational responses observed, although in one case treatment with a mixture resulted in only a 9% increase in metabolite formation compared with treatment with pure compounds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In contrast to the strain TA 98, TA 98NR is not able to carry out the initial metabolic step to form 1-nitrosopyrene, whereas both strains can perform the next reductive step to form N-hydroxy-l-nitropyrene, believed to be the reactive 1-NP intermediate (McCoy et al, 1984;Heflich et al, 1985;Filer et al, 1986a). Figure 1 shows the mutagenicity of purified 1-NP with microsomal preparations from lung and liver of rabbit, rat and hamster.…”
Section: -Np Mutagenicity With Microsornal Activationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitroarenes are activated to mutagenic species in bacteria in the absence of mammalian metabolism systems (Rosenkranz and Mermelstein, 1983). Whereas nitroreduction by bacterial enzymes to form a C8 deoxyguanosine DNA adduct is strongly associated with mutation induction for 1-NP, the intermediate reduction products derived from compounds such as dinitropyrenes are further activated by acetylation (Bryant et al, 1984;Heflich et al, 1985;Fifer et al, 1986a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%