2000
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0215(20001101)88:3<325::aid-ijc1>3.0.co;2-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA adducts as markers of exposure to carcinogens and risk of cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantification of 8-oxo-2¢-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodG) in blood or urine is the most commonly utilized biomarker of in vivo oxidative DNA damage [36,58,66,67]. Elevated levels of 8-oxodG are believed to reflect deficient DNA repair capacity and an increased risk of cancer [68][69][70]. However, no studies have evaluated the role of oxidative stress or oxidative DNA damage in mutation carriers.…”
Section: Brca Mutation Carriers Of Todaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantification of 8-oxo-2¢-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodG) in blood or urine is the most commonly utilized biomarker of in vivo oxidative DNA damage [36,58,66,67]. Elevated levels of 8-oxodG are believed to reflect deficient DNA repair capacity and an increased risk of cancer [68][69][70]. However, no studies have evaluated the role of oxidative stress or oxidative DNA damage in mutation carriers.…”
Section: Brca Mutation Carriers Of Todaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomarkers are used to identify molecular and cellular alterations in target tissues during toxicological processes that occur within crucial pathways following exposure to toxic chemicals such as carcinogens (Vineis and Perera, 2000;Lee et al, 2002;Bartsch et al, 2011;Aylward et al, 2014) (Figure 1). In some cases, biomarker alterations may be determined in blood, body fluids, cells, and tissues to evaluate exposure levels in animals and humans (Perera et al, 1988;DeCaprio, 1997;Pedersen et al, 2012;Roh et al, 2012;DeMarini, 2013).…”
Section: In Order To Investigate the Potential Application Of Blood Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conceptually, DNA adducts are de®ned as biologically e ective dose markers of exposure to carcinogens; they not only re¯ect prior exposure to carcinogens but also imply a tangible risk for cancer (Poirier et al 2000, Vineis and Perera 2000, Hemminki et al 2001). The latter aspect should be interpreted quite cautiously since DNA adduct formation is only one step in the multi-stage process of carcinogenesis, and many other in¯uential factors such as cellular proliferation are also involved in this process (Poirier et al 2000, Vineis and Perera 2000, Hemminki et al 2001. Therefore, it is premature to rely solely on dosimetry of DNA adducts for cancer risk estimation.…”
Section: Tobacco Smoke Carcinogensmentioning
confidence: 99%