2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA barcodes for ecology, evolution, and conservation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
351
0
10

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 440 publications
(366 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(134 reference statements)
5
351
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Our focus was to develop a genotyping tool specifically for predominant white oaks of the North Americas. Given the difficulties of phylogenetic inference in forest trees and oaks in particular, our targeted barcode is not an appropriate tool for community phylogenetics or biodiversity discovery (Kress, García‐Robledo, Uriarte, & Erickson, 2015; Kress et al., 2009) or inferring phylogenetic relationships among large numbers of individuals within diverse clades (The Global Carex Group et al., 2016). It is, however, appropriate to investigations of species identity and hybridization among white oaks of eastern North American deciduous forests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our focus was to develop a genotyping tool specifically for predominant white oaks of the North Americas. Given the difficulties of phylogenetic inference in forest trees and oaks in particular, our targeted barcode is not an appropriate tool for community phylogenetics or biodiversity discovery (Kress, García‐Robledo, Uriarte, & Erickson, 2015; Kress et al., 2009) or inferring phylogenetic relationships among large numbers of individuals within diverse clades (The Global Carex Group et al., 2016). It is, however, appropriate to investigations of species identity and hybridization among white oaks of eastern North American deciduous forests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2003a; Kress et al. 2014). DNA barcoding is generally presented as a means to automate the recognition of previously defined taxa, and a 648‐base pair region of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit one (COX1) gene has proven highly effective in correctly distinguishing among metazoan species (Hebert et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the species concept is very elusive for the microbial world, where the strain/isolate definition might be more practically helpful to allow exhaustive description of phenotypic features (Ahn, Chai, and Pan 2014;Caro-Quintero and Konstantinidis 2012). This can be potentially addressed through specific and progressively advanced molecular methods such as DNA barcoding and metagenomics (Gilbert and Dupont 2011;Kress et al 2015;Shokralla et al 2014;Simon and Daniel 2011).…”
Section: Major Challenges For the Global Implementation Of Ebvsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also includes molecular biodiversity data (e.g. barcoding, meta-barcoding and metagenomic approaches based on next-generation sequencing technologies and bioinformatic data analysis) which increasingly allow species or strain identification at a high rate and accuracy, even in the most remote and extreme ecosystems (Gilbert and Dupont 2011;Kress et al 2015;Shokralla et al 2014;Simon and Daniel 2011). Workshop 3 will be centred on the EBV class 'Species traits' which can include phenology, plant functional traits, animal body mass, natal dispersal distances or migratory behaviour (Pereira et al 2013).…”
Section: Scientific Content and Workhops Of Globis-bmentioning
confidence: 99%