Cycad Biology and Conservation: The 9th International Conference on Cycad Biology 2018
DOI: 10.21135/893275389.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA Barcoding Africa’s Endemic Cycads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These individual samples were also unexpectedly clustered with their other species groups in the dendrograms and network analyses (Figure 6; Figure S3). Although the results suggest that these species are genetically indistinguishable from E. hirsutus, this is unlikely since E. hirsutus is phylogenetically distinct from the E. eugene-maraisii complex [86,103]. The behaviour of these samples may instead reflect missing alleles or numerous spurious bands since samples deemed genetically similar to E. hirsutus samples all possess approximately 50 bands, whereas E. hirsutus samples possessed 83 and 73 bands respectively.…”
Section: Structure Analysismentioning
confidence: 82%
“…These individual samples were also unexpectedly clustered with their other species groups in the dendrograms and network analyses (Figure 6; Figure S3). Although the results suggest that these species are genetically indistinguishable from E. hirsutus, this is unlikely since E. hirsutus is phylogenetically distinct from the E. eugene-maraisii complex [86,103]. The behaviour of these samples may instead reflect missing alleles or numerous spurious bands since samples deemed genetically similar to E. hirsutus samples all possess approximately 50 bands, whereas E. hirsutus samples possessed 83 and 73 bands respectively.…”
Section: Structure Analysismentioning
confidence: 82%