2017
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA barcoding of invasive plants in China: A resource for identifying invasive plants

Abstract: Invasive plants have aroused attention globally for causing ecological damage and having a negative impact on the economy and human health. However, it can be extremely challenging to rapidly and accurately identify invasive plants based on morphology because they are an assemblage of many different families and many plant materials lack sufficient diagnostic characteristics during border inspections. It is therefore urgent to evaluate candidate loci and build a reliable genetic library to prevent invasive pla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
41
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
5
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Genetic and genomic data are of critical importance for many applications, including species delimitation [1][2][3], studies on evolution and phylogenies [4][5][6], biodiversity assessments and conservation [7,8], reconstructions of past plant communities [9][10][11], or for more applied tasks such as forensics [12,13], pollination and food web studies [14][15][16] and monitoring of invasive species [17]. While many of these tasks can be undertaken by sequencing plastid or rDNA amplicons [1,2,18,19], increasing emphasis has been given to the potential of using genomic data for DNA barcoding and wider phylogenomic studies [4,[20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic and genomic data are of critical importance for many applications, including species delimitation [1][2][3], studies on evolution and phylogenies [4][5][6], biodiversity assessments and conservation [7,8], reconstructions of past plant communities [9][10][11], or for more applied tasks such as forensics [12,13], pollination and food web studies [14][15][16] and monitoring of invasive species [17]. While many of these tasks can be undertaken by sequencing plastid or rDNA amplicons [1,2,18,19], increasing emphasis has been given to the potential of using genomic data for DNA barcoding and wider phylogenomic studies [4,[20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since DNA barcoding was formally proposed at a large scale in 2003 [1], it has been widely used in different fields, for example species delimitation [2,3], cryptic diversity discovering [4,5], investigating host-parasitoid interactions [6,7], pest quarantine, and environmental monitoring [8][9][10]. A fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene has been proven to be a standard DNA barcode region for animal species identification and detecting molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs) [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene has been proven to be a standard DNA barcode region for animal species identification and detecting molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs) [11,12]. The usability of DNA barcoding has been reported in many groups, for instance Perciformes [13], invasive plants [3], Lepidoptera [2,4], Coleoptera [14,15], and Hymenoptera [16,17]. The power and accuracy of DNA barcoding, as well as unambiguous species identification may depend on sampling scales [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MEGA software v.7 (Kumar et al, 2016) was used to edit the raw sequence reads and to construct the consensus sequences. To search the phylogenetic position of the study-species, the phylogeny given in Xu et al (2018) was reconstructed with the sequences generated in this study. Initially, the multiple sequence alignments were constructed separately for ITS and rbcL markers individually and then the alignments were concatenated in MEGA v.7.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%