2004
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA Barcoding: Promise and Pitfalls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
707
0
9

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 839 publications
(721 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
707
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no single optimal method to determine the resolving power of DNA barcodes for all taxa (Austerlitz et al., 2009; Casiraghi et al., 2010; Collins & Cruickshank, 2013; Meyer & Paulay, 2005; Moritz & Cicero, 2004; Ross et al., 2008). Different approaches exist for matching an unknown query sequence with sequences in a reference database or library and tend to be based on ad hoc criteria which may include the frequency of the highest hits, percentage sequence similarity, bootstrapping, BLAST scores or tree‐based clustering assessment (Kress et al., 2009; Wilson et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no single optimal method to determine the resolving power of DNA barcodes for all taxa (Austerlitz et al., 2009; Casiraghi et al., 2010; Collins & Cruickshank, 2013; Meyer & Paulay, 2005; Moritz & Cicero, 2004; Ross et al., 2008). Different approaches exist for matching an unknown query sequence with sequences in a reference database or library and tend to be based on ad hoc criteria which may include the frequency of the highest hits, percentage sequence similarity, bootstrapping, BLAST scores or tree‐based clustering assessment (Kress et al., 2009; Wilson et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtained data for 184 specimens (see supplementary on-line Appendix S1) comprising 33 of the 41 described 235 species (>80%: 2/2 Ceroptres, 6/6 Saphonecrus, 23/30 Synergus, 2/3 Synophrus; Csóka et al, 10 2005;Sadeghi et al, 2006). Because the ability of DNA barcodes to assign individuals to species requires adequate sampling of intraspecific as well as interspecific variation (Moritz & Cicero, 2004;Morando et al, 2003), where possible we incorporated samples from multiple refugial centres of intraspecific diversity (Rokas et al, 2003b) Specimens were identified by Melika and Pujade-Villar, recognised experts in the field of morphological cynipid taxonomy and the authors of the existing keys (Pujade-Villar et al, 2003). Due to difficulties in morphological identification, some individual specimens were 255 assigned >1 morphospecies name (see Appendix S1).…”
Section: Taxon Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter hypothesis predicts a mismatch between specimen groupings based on mitochondrial sequence data and those 515 based on nuclear sequence data. There are many reasons to expect such a mismatch (Hudson 21 & Turelli, 2003;Machado and Hey, 2003;Moritz & Cicero, 2004;Hurst & Jiggins, 2005). In particular, coalescent theory predicts that species can share coxI barcodes through incomplete sorting of ancestral polymorphism (Hickerson et al, 2006;Knowles & Carstens, 2007), and many species are polyphyletic rather than monophyletic for mitochondrial genes (Johnson & 520 Cicero 2002;Funk & Omland, 2003;Meyer & Paulay, 2005).…”
Section: Mismatches Between Morphological Taxonomy and Motu Membershimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For exam-ple, in the Hyalospheniidae, SSU rRNA does not allow to discriminating among closely related taxa (Lara et al 2008) while COI does (Kosakyan et al 2012(Kosakyan et al , 2013. The COI-based metabarcoding approach allows discrimination among taxa that are generally interpreted as biological species, for Metazoa (Hebert et al 2003;Ratnasingham and Hebert 2007) (but see Meyer and Paulay 2005;Moritz and Cicero 2004) and our recent work on Hyalospheniidae also supports this view Kosakyan et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%