2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10811-018-1529-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA barcoding reveals cryptic diversity of economic red algae, Pyropia (Bangiales, Rhodophyta): description of novel species from Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The delimitation of species was undertaken recently using molecular tools, an advent that has redefined the boundaries of former taxa over the last 10 years (e.g., Broom et al 2002, Brodie et al 2007, Neefus et al 2008, Nelson 2013, Dumilag et al 2016, Guillemin et al 2016, Reddy et al 2018, Yang et al 2018. A high level of cryptic genetic diversity was found within Porphyra and Pyropia (Brodie et al 2007, Niwa et al 2009, Lindstrom et al 2015, Guillemin et al 2016, Koh and Kim 2018, Reddy et al 2018, Yang et al 2018. According to Zuccarello (2011), these new taxa that cannot be identified based on morphology could drive field ecology studies to misleading conclusions and impair our understanding of the evolutionary processes that generated this diversity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The delimitation of species was undertaken recently using molecular tools, an advent that has redefined the boundaries of former taxa over the last 10 years (e.g., Broom et al 2002, Brodie et al 2007, Neefus et al 2008, Nelson 2013, Dumilag et al 2016, Guillemin et al 2016, Reddy et al 2018, Yang et al 2018. A high level of cryptic genetic diversity was found within Porphyra and Pyropia (Brodie et al 2007, Niwa et al 2009, Lindstrom et al 2015, Guillemin et al 2016, Koh and Kim 2018, Reddy et al 2018, Yang et al 2018. According to Zuccarello (2011), these new taxa that cannot be identified based on morphology could drive field ecology studies to misleading conclusions and impair our understanding of the evolutionary processes that generated this diversity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LSU analysis could not resolve Hypoglosseae species closely related to H. sabahense because there is less sequence data for this tribe (8 sequences) than rbcL (16 sequences). COI is known to be useful for DNA barcoding and detection of cryptic diversity (e.g., Koh and Kim 2018). However, the genetic distances of this gene (6.44-25.84%) were much larger than those of rbcL (2.37-17.69%) and LSU (1.74-21.20%), so the evolutionary rate of COI may be too high to unravel the relation-not resolve the relationship with H. sabahense (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genera of macroalgae with well-known challenges in morphology-based identification include Ectocarpus (Leliaert andDe Clerck 2017, Montecinos et al 2017), Desmarestia (Yang et al 2014), Gracilaria (Kim et al 2010), Ulvella (Nielsen et al 2013), Fucus (Kucera 2010), Porphyra/Pyropia and relatives (Kucera 2010, Koh andKim 2018), Ulva ( Kucera 2010, Silva et al 2013, Grateloupia (Gavio and Fredericq 2002) and Cladophora (Hayakawa et al 2012, Taylor et al 2017) among others. For example, Ulva species have been underestimated in the Mediterranean, as a result of cryptic species within this group (Wolf et al 2012).…”
Section: Genus and Species Delimitation In Macroalgaementioning
confidence: 99%