1989
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1989.388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA content in high and intermediate grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma-prognostic significance and clinicopathological correlations

Abstract: Summary Flow cytometric (FCM) estimation of DNA content has been performed on tumour tissue from 197 patients with high and intermediate grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) to investigate the clinicopathological correlations and prognostic significance of DNA ploidy and proliferative activity. Fifty-one per cent of tumours were diploid; the remaining non-diploid tumours were near diploid (14%), aneuploid (28%) and tetraploid (7%). In 81 tumours multiple analyses were performed from different regions of the tumo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, there is a correlation between the rate of proliferation and the grade of lymphoma, with low-grade lymphomas expressing a low growth fraction and vice-versa [38][39][40]. In this disease, the impact of proliferation on survival is generally reported as being negative [41][42][43][44], and only rarely it is positively associated with response [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, there is a correlation between the rate of proliferation and the grade of lymphoma, with low-grade lymphomas expressing a low growth fraction and vice-versa [38][39][40]. In this disease, the impact of proliferation on survival is generally reported as being negative [41][42][43][44], and only rarely it is positively associated with response [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparable performance of these methods in measuring computer synthesised histograms suggests that the differences observed in the clinical series do not reflect operator error, but rather that there exists subtle differences between synthesised and experimentally derived histograms which lead to a greater variation in values for cell proliferation as determined by different analysis programs. This may partly explain the variable results described for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma by several authors (Bauer et al, 1986;McLaughlin et al, 1988;Wooldridge et al, 1988;Cowan et al, 1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The biological behaviour of lymphoma may also be assessed by determining the rapidity of cell proliferation using various methods, such as measuring the size of the S phase fraction (SPF) by flow cytometry (Christensson et al, 1986, Young et al, 1987Lenner et al, 1987;Cowan et al, 1989;Lehtinen et al, 1989), assessing expression of Ki-67 antigen (Gerdes et al, 1984;Grogan et al, 1988;Hall et al, 1988;Brown et al, 1989), or by immunocytochemical detection of 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) incorporation in the DNA (Witzig et al, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lymphomas where >50% of cells showed positive staining for PCNA had inferior 5-year survival as compared with those with less than 50% of positive cells (57% vs 41%, P = 0.008). The presence of > 50% of positively staining cells for PCNA was strongly associated with a larger than the median size of the SPF (median, 8.3%) (Christensson et al, 1986, Young et al, 1987Lenner et al, 1987;Cowan et al, 1989;Lehtinen et al, 1989), assessing expression of Ki-67 antigen (Gerdes et al, 1984;Grogan et al, 1988;Hall et al, 1988;Brown et al, 1989), or by immunocytochemical detection of 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) incorporation in the DNA (Witzig et al, 1989).Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), also known as cyclin, is a 36 kD nuclear protein (Bravo & Celis, 1980;Bravo et al, 1987) that was originally detected by using autoantibodies from sera of patients with SLE (Miyachi et al, 1978). PCNA is expressed in a high concentration during the S phase fraction of the cell cycle in the nuclei of proliferating cells, and in a lesser amount during the GI and G2/mitosis phases (Kamel et al, 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%