2000
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0274(200009)38:3<330::aid-ajim13>3.0.co;2-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA damage and repair in cells of lead exposed people

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While some studies have reported an increase in single‐strand breaks (SSBs) in peripheral lymphocytes of humans occupationally exposed to high levels of lead [40–43], other studies have detected no increase in SSBs associated with lead exposure [44,45]. As a potential explanation for this discrepancy, we offer the following.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…While some studies have reported an increase in single‐strand breaks (SSBs) in peripheral lymphocytes of humans occupationally exposed to high levels of lead [40–43], other studies have detected no increase in SSBs associated with lead exposure [44,45]. As a potential explanation for this discrepancy, we offer the following.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Most studies of lead-exposed human populations report chromosomal toxicity and interference with repair of DNA damage 118, 119 leading to increased in vitro mutagenicity 120. Despite limitations with exposure assessment, the direction of risk in most cohort studies of lead exposure has been positive 121.…”
Section: Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a sustained and sizeable decrease in human body Pb burden has been observed at the same time (Gottlieb, 1998), scientific interest and concerns among public health researchers and epidemiologists over the long-term negative potential of Pb contamination have not abated. In particular, attention has focused on reproductive, genotoxic, carcinogenic, and neurological effects (Fu and Boffetta, 1995;Apostoli et al, 2000;Hertz-Picciotto, 2000;Lorente et al, 2000;Ojajarvi et al, 2000;Pesch et al, 2000;Restrepo et al, 2000;Schwartz et al, 2000;Silbergeld et al, 2000). For these reasons, populations exposed to environmental Pb deserve to be monitored in order to detect early reversible abnormalities and lifethreatening disorders and, as a corollary result, to improve the scientific knowledge on the biological impairments attributable to Pb burdens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%