2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04317-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA damage in blood leucocytes of prostate cancer patients during therapy with 177Lu-PSMA

Abstract: Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate the time- and dose-dependency of DNA double-strand break (DSB) induction and repair in peripheral blood leucocytes of prostate cancer patients during therapy with 177 Lu-PSMA. Methods Blood samples from 16 prostate cancer patients receiving their first 177 Lu-PSMA therapy were taken before and at seven time-points (between 1 h and 96 h) after radionuclide administratio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average number of RIF per cell in this very low-dose range was higher than expected according to a previously established ex vivo calibration curve for the internal irradiation of blood with the radionuclides 131 I and 177 Lu [10]. The slope of the latter ex vivo calibration curve was (0.0147 ± 0.0006) mGy −1 [10], similar to the slopes of in vivo calibration curves established in several patient studies investigating DSB induction during therapy with 131 I (slope of (0.0117 ± 0.0006) mGy −1 ) [8], [ 177 Lu]Lu-DOTATATE/DOTATOC (slope of (0.0127 ± 0.0009) mGy −1 ) [9] and [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T (slope of (0.0122 ± 0.0015) mGy −1 ) [7]. However, all our previous studies [7][8][9][10] mainly covered the dose range between 6 mGy and 100 mGy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The average number of RIF per cell in this very low-dose range was higher than expected according to a previously established ex vivo calibration curve for the internal irradiation of blood with the radionuclides 131 I and 177 Lu [10]. The slope of the latter ex vivo calibration curve was (0.0147 ± 0.0006) mGy −1 [10], similar to the slopes of in vivo calibration curves established in several patient studies investigating DSB induction during therapy with 131 I (slope of (0.0117 ± 0.0006) mGy −1 ) [8], [ 177 Lu]Lu-DOTATATE/DOTATOC (slope of (0.0127 ± 0.0009) mGy −1 ) [9] and [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T (slope of (0.0122 ± 0.0015) mGy −1 ) [7]. However, all our previous studies [7][8][9][10] mainly covered the dose range between 6 mGy and 100 mGy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slope of the latter ex vivo calibration curve was (0.0147 ± 0.0006) mGy −1 [10], similar to the slopes of in vivo calibration curves established in several patient studies investigating DSB induction during therapy with 131 I (slope of (0.0117 ± 0.0006) mGy −1 ) [8], [ 177 Lu]Lu-DOTATATE/DOTATOC (slope of (0.0127 ± 0.0009) mGy −1 ) [9] and [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T (slope of (0.0122 ± 0.0015) mGy −1 ) [7]. However, all our previous studies [7][8][9][10] mainly covered the dose range between 6 mGy and 100 mGy. Compared to these results, the slope in the present study of (0.130 ± 0.018) mGy −1 was approximately ten-fold higher, indicating that DSB induction might be increased in the very low-dose range <10 mGy, indicative of low-dose radio hypersensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations