2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2006.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA damage in multiple organs after exposure to chlorhexidine in Wistar rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
34
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Hermeto et al 2014;Timoroglu et al, 2014). In circulating blood samples (Grassi et al, 2007;Braz et al, 2011;Costa et al, 2011;Kasuba et al, 2012), for example, it is not common to find damage frequently, which may also occur due to clonal expansion, when the pH > 13 comet assay version is used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hermeto et al 2014;Timoroglu et al, 2014). In circulating blood samples (Grassi et al, 2007;Braz et al, 2011;Costa et al, 2011;Kasuba et al, 2012), for example, it is not common to find damage frequently, which may also occur due to clonal expansion, when the pH > 13 comet assay version is used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in which an automatic analysis system is used to determine DNA damage using the comet assay show limited parameters such as only the DNA percentage in the tail (Osipov et al, 2014) or the tail intensity (Priestley et al, 2010;Braz et al, 2011;Costa et al, 2011;Camargo et al, 2013;Valença-Silva et al, 2014), or this parameter is associated with others, such as tail moment and tail length, in the results (Grassi et al, 2007;Kasuba et al, 2012;Aydin et al, 2013;Pant et al, 2014;Timoroglu et al, 2014). However, there is still no consensus regarding the best parameter for MSCs or other biological samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Nancy and Don [32], cultured human periodontal cells treated with 2% chlorhexidine exhibited a foamy appearance in which most of the cytoplasm seemed to have been extracted from the cells. According to an in vivo genotoxicity study conducted by Grassi et al [33] in rats, chlorhexidine induced DNA damage in leukocytes, renal cells and oral mucosal cells. And in an in vitro study on rat oral mucosal cells and rat leukocytes, Ribeiro et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have demonstrated that chlorhexidine does not induce genetic damage in vitro (57,65). Nevertheless, chlorhexidine is potent at causing genotoxic damage in several tissues and organs, such as liver, kidney and oral mucosa cells in vivo (66)(67)(68)(69). When associated with calcium hydroxide, chlorhexidine exerts both anti-oxidant and prooxidant activities through scavenging superoxide radicals by the xanthine/xanthine oxidase reaction and induction of reactive species production including hydrogen peroxide and superoxide radicals, respectively (70).…”
Section: Endodontic Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%