2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.06.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA damage repair and genetic polymorphisms: Assessment of individual sensitivity and repair capacity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
44
2
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
44
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…After 60 minutes from the exposure, the values did not significantly differ from the control values before irradiation in both control and exposed group. Those results were different that the ones found by Cornetta et al (2006) during DNA repair assessment after the exposure to the dose of 2 Gy. They have shown that even after 60 minutes from the exposure, TI were still significantly higher than before radiation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…After 60 minutes from the exposure, the values did not significantly differ from the control values before irradiation in both control and exposed group. Those results were different that the ones found by Cornetta et al (2006) during DNA repair assessment after the exposure to the dose of 2 Gy. They have shown that even after 60 minutes from the exposure, TI were still significantly higher than before radiation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…The analysis of comet assay parameters did not give consistent results. Immediately after the irradiation with the dose of 2 Gy, values for tail intensity, which is recently considered the most reliable parameter for DNA damage estimation (Collins, 2004), were higher than the values of other authors for the same dose (Cornetta et al, 2006). The exposed and control group also had significantly higher TL and TM for all observed time intervals when compared to the control values before irradiation in both groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DNA adducts are repaired primarily by components of the nucleotide excision repair pathway (NER: xeroderma pigmentosum group A (XPA) and XPD) and to a lesser extent by components in the base excision repair pathway (BER: X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1)) (Yeh et al 2005). Left unrepaired, DNA adducts can induce DNA damage; specifically, micronucleus formation, DNA strand breaks and sister chromatid exchanges are markers of DNA damage that have been associated with PhIP and MeIQx exposures, and associations have been observed between these markers and components of the NER (XPD and XPC), BER (XRCC1 and ADP-ribosyltransferase (ADPRT)) and homologous repair (XRCC3) pathways (Cornetta et al 2006;Godderis et al 2006;Wang et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The XRCC1 gene codes for a DNA-repair enzyme that is involved in base excision repair of oxidative DNA damage as well as single-strand break repair. Evidence has shown that polymorphisms in DNA repair genes could influence individual DNA repair capacity [4]. Lu et al suggested that XRCC1 Arg194Trp polymorphism was associated with increased risk for glioma, especially in Asians [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%