2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0027-5107(02)00084-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA damage response pathway in radioadaptive response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
82
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
2
82
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This cytoprotective response was optimally induced when the cells were irradiated with γ-rays at 0.25-0.5 Gy. In contrast, it was reported that the DNA/chromosomal protection was optimally induced when various mammalian cell types were pre-irradiated below ~0.1 Gy (Ikushima et al, 1996;Shimizu et al, 1999;Sasaki et al, 2002). Therefore, the optimal dose range for IR-induced cytoprotective responses appears to vary depending on experimental settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This cytoprotective response was optimally induced when the cells were irradiated with γ-rays at 0.25-0.5 Gy. In contrast, it was reported that the DNA/chromosomal protection was optimally induced when various mammalian cell types were pre-irradiated below ~0.1 Gy (Ikushima et al, 1996;Shimizu et al, 1999;Sasaki et al, 2002). Therefore, the optimal dose range for IR-induced cytoprotective responses appears to vary depending on experimental settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Some investigators explored this latter possibility by using the TUNEL assay, a method widely used to diagnose DNA fragmentation induced during apoptosis (McGahon et al, 1995). The reported results suggest that the pre-irradiation can reduce the challenge-induced accumulation of TUNEL-positive cells (Takahashi et al, 2001;Sasaki et al, 2002). While this data was interpreted in a way that the IR-induced cytoprotection can act against apoptosis, it should be noted that the TUNEL assay reflects genotoxic effects of IR, not necessarily apoptosis.…”
Section: Ionizing Radiation Induces Blockade Of C-jun N-terminal Kinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in mp53 cells, induction of the radio-adaptive response was not observed. p53, which plays a key role in protecting the genome (Lane, 1992), is the most important factor in the signaling pathway of the radioadaptive response because various endpoints used to study this response such as changes in apoptosis levels (Wang et al, 2000;Hendrikse et al, 2000;Takahashi, 2001;Okazaki et al, 2007), micronuclei induction (Sasaki et al, 2002) and chromosome aberrations (Takahashi et al, 2008b) are not observed in p53-null and mp53 cells. It should be noted that an accumulation of p53 was induced after a high-dose irradiation alone, but was not induced after a priming irradiation followed by a subsequent challenging irradiation in wtp53 cells (Takahashi et al, 2008b).…”
Section: − 29 −mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies and reviews (Bala & Mathew, 2000;Luckey, 2008;Pandey et al, 2006;Sasaki et al, 2002) document that exposure to small doses of ionizing radiation enhanced the tolerance towards the detrimental effects of lethal doses of ionizing radiation given subsequently. Such phenomenon was observed in prokaryotes as well as in eukaryotes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%