2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04606.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA extraction from bovine faeces: current status and future trends

Abstract: Summary There is an increasing interest in the detection and enumeration of micro‐organisms pathogenic for human and present in bovine faeces. This interest is because pollution of the environment by animal faeces may affect the safety of food and of drinking or recreational water. Detection and quantification of microbial pathogens carried out using DNA extracted from the faecal matrix are affected by the quality and the quantity of the DNA extracts, which are critical factors that limit the accuracy and sens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(205 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Addressing this knowledge gap now appears feasible, as real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) can be used as an alternative to culture-based methods for quantifying environmental pathogens (7,23,29). Improvements in sample preparation and nucleic acid cleanup methods have largely overcome problems associated with the molecular biology-based analysis of fecal matter (22). Further, qPCR can detect stressed, damaged, and otherwise nonculturable cells persisting in a state of dormancy or indeed dead (15,17,29).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Addressing this knowledge gap now appears feasible, as real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) can be used as an alternative to culture-based methods for quantifying environmental pathogens (7,23,29). Improvements in sample preparation and nucleic acid cleanup methods have largely overcome problems associated with the molecular biology-based analysis of fecal matter (22). Further, qPCR can detect stressed, damaged, and otherwise nonculturable cells persisting in a state of dormancy or indeed dead (15,17,29).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have highlighted the need for careful consideration of DNA extraction methods from different animal species (Goldberg et al, 2016;Hart et al, 2015;Rapp, 2010). For example, DNA was successfully extracted from fish faecal samples using the isopropanol method, while the MoBio Power Fecal DNA kit (Qiagen Pty Ltd, Chadstone, Victoria, Australia) was needed to extract quality DNA from equine faecal samples (Hart et al, 2015).…”
Section: (B) (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the complex matrix of faecal samples make it a challenging job to choose the most suitable extraction protocol as some common methods, such as the cell lysis by boiling method, are incapable of removing faecal inhibitors (Rapp, 2010;Wilson, 1997).…”
Section: (B) (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, real-time PCR is not commonly used for the direct detection of foodborne pathogenic bacteria in feces because fecal components can inhibit real-time PCR (4). To obtain useable PCR templates from crude human feces, column purification methods that require numerous time-consuming technical steps are often used to remove inhibitors (5). We wanted to develop a very rapid, simple method within 5 steps for the extraction and purification of bacterial DNA from human feces, because actual outbreaks of foodborne illnesses require rapid pathogen detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%