2003
DOI: 10.1038/nature01577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA helicase Srs2 disrupts the Rad51 presynaptic filament

Abstract: Mutations in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene SRS2 result in the yeast's sensitivity to genotoxic agents, failure to recover or adapt from DNA damage checkpoint-mediated cell cycle arrest, slow growth, chromosome loss, and hyper-recombination. Furthermore, double mutant strains, with mutations in DNA helicase genes SRS2 and SGS1, show low viability that can be overcome by inactivating recombination, implying that untimely recombination is the cause of growth impairment. Here we clarify the role of SRS2 in rec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

35
650
2
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 589 publications
(704 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
35
650
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the 3 -end of the leading strand is elongated beyond the lesion on the lagging strand as template. Srs2 could discourage D-loop formation acting at a presynaptic stage (Krejci et al, 2003;Veaute et al, 2003) or a postsynaptic stage by disrupting the D-loop to relocate the formerly arrested, now elongated, strand back onto its original template. This is similar to its function in promoting SDSA in double-strand break repair ( Figure 5E; Ira et al, 2003;Dupaigne et al, 2008).…”
Section: Mph1 Is Likely To Have a Role In Recombinational Dna Repair mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the 3 -end of the leading strand is elongated beyond the lesion on the lagging strand as template. Srs2 could discourage D-loop formation acting at a presynaptic stage (Krejci et al, 2003;Veaute et al, 2003) or a postsynaptic stage by disrupting the D-loop to relocate the formerly arrested, now elongated, strand back onto its original template. This is similar to its function in promoting SDSA in double-strand break repair ( Figure 5E; Ira et al, 2003;Dupaigne et al, 2008).…”
Section: Mph1 Is Likely To Have a Role In Recombinational Dna Repair mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monoubiquitinated PCNA can be polyubiquitinated by the Rad5-Ubc13-Mms2 complex (Hofmann and Pickart, 1999) to allow error-free mechanisms (Torres-Ramos et al, 2002). Alternatively, K164 of PCNA can be SUMOylated to regulate recombination at the fork (Pfander et al, 2005;Moldovan et al, 2006) via a direct interaction with Srs2 (Pfander et al, 2005), a 3 -5 DNA helicase (Rong and Klein, 1993), thought to exert a negative control on HR (Krejci et al, 2003;Veaute et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic data indicate that Srs2 negatively regulates recombination [70,71] possibly by reversal of intermediate recombination structures [72][73][74][75]. Indeed, the DNA strand exchange mediated by Rad51 is inhibited by Srs2 through disruption of the Rad51-ssDNA filaments [76,77], and it turns out that sumoylated PCNA has increased affinity for Srs2 [78,79] and represses the Rad52-dependent recombination pathway [80]. These observations collectively support the hypothesis that Srs2 serves as a molecular switch between homologous recombination and DDT [6], and further confirm that the sensor for this switch is the state of PCNA modification.…”
Section: Ddt In Saccharomyces Cerevisiaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phenotype of sgs1 mutants includes a slight reduction in growth rate, a 10-fold increase in chromosome missegregation, an elevated mitotic recombination frequency, a high sensitivity to methyl methanesulfonate and hydroxyurea (HU) (15,66), and premature aging as a consequence of an increased number of extrachromosomal ribosomal DNA circles in the cell (17,51,60,61). Sgs1p acts redundantly with the budding yeast helicase Srs2p, which has been shown to inhibit loading of Rad51p onto single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) in vitro (33,56). In addition, the sgs1 mutants display some meiotic defects such as delayed meiotic prophase and defective chromosome synapsis (16,45).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%